On 4/28/06, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn proposed this be undeprecated (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/
zope3-dev/2005-December/016781.html) and others agreed, at least in
part. AIUI, Martijn ended up not making any changes in Zope 3, but
somehow changing Zope 2 in such a way a
Hello,
Thank you for replying.
Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> Zope-3.2.1.tgz does not have the version.txt in src/zope/app,
>>> so Zope version is set to "Development/Unknown" in zopeversion.py.
>>>
>>> Though I think that it is not so serious problem,
>>> we should update the tar ball or leave it?
>
> L
Martijn proposed this be undeprecated (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/
zope3-dev/2005-December/016781.html) and others agreed, at least in
part. AIUI, Martijn ended up not making any changes in Zope 3, but
somehow changing Zope 2 in such a way as to work around his issue.
The deprecation ce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yoshito Komatsu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Zope-3.2.1.tgz does not have the version.txt in src/zope/app,
> so Zope version is set to "Development/Unknown" in zopeversion.py.
>
> Though I think that it is not so serious problem,
> we should update the tar ba
Hello,
Zope-3.2.1.tgz does not have the version.txt in src/zope/app,
so Zope version is set to "Development/Unknown" in zopeversion.py.
Though I think that it is not so serious problem,
we should update the tar ball or leave it?
--
Yoshito Komatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm about to merge the jim-adapter branch.
This branch has three major refactorings on it:
- A redesign of the adapter registration machinery
Hey, just some feedback and kudos to you, Jim. Component registration is
now indeed a lot more simple, and
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'm about to merge the jim-adapter branch.
This branch has three major refactorings on it:
- A redesign of the adapter registration machinery
Hey, just some feedback and kudos to you, Jim. Component registration is
now indeed a lot more simple, and more flexible. The abili
After looking at this checkin, and related to my experiments with
python and gnome-vfs [1], I'm left wondering if Zope shouldn't have a
interface that specifies a structure similar to what a os.stat() call
returns.
That would make the overhead of implementing stuff that needs only
creation/modific