[Zope3-dev] Re: Through-the-web reStructuredText

2006-07-10 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: So forking docutils inside Zope is *not* evil, even when considering packaged versions, as long as the packagers know about the fork, right? The unforked docutils provides the necessary safety when used correctly. It is our

[Zope3-dev] Re: Through-the-web reStructuredText

2006-07-10 Thread Jim Fulton
On Jul 10, 2006, at 3:16 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: ... As Florent pointed out, long experience with text processing systems on Unix (Tex, postscript, etc.) says that enabling file inclusion by default is a security hole. Leaving it enabled by default makes docutils at least partly to blame for

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Version control of ZOPE3 objects

2006-07-10 Thread Pjotr Prins
Thanks Tres for the reply. It really helps. I agree transactions are a problem. If SVN fails there is no clear route to notify the user. On the other hand we merely would use it for 'historic' storage - a one way system for moving objects. As we have to have a queue anyway, on failure an object

[Zope3-dev] Doctest and Footnotes

2006-07-10 Thread Benji York
Gary Poster had a really good idea a couple weeks ago: teach doctest about ReST-style footnotes. I implemented it over the weekend and brought it to Tim Peter's attention today. Tim generally liked the idea and suggested I bring it up on python-dev, which I have. Here's the idea: when a