yuppie wrote:
Looking at the output generated by formlib, I got the impression nobody
cares much about valid output.
formlib's standard template is horrible. zope.app.form's rendering is
much better. I have no idea why formlib uses its own horrid template any
way, it could simply have used
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
And there is nothing wrong with using inheritance when there is a
'__IS A __' type of relation (e.g. an ordered folder IS A folder IS
AN item, ...), or if there is a HAS_A type of relation (a folder has
items, a chair has four legs...). It
Hi Philipp!
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Looking at the output generated by formlib, I got the impression
nobody cares much about valid output.
formlib's standard template is horrible. zope.app.form's rendering is
much better. I have no idea why formlib uses its own
yuppie wrote:
Adding additional complexity for
getting the label issue perfectly right doesn't fit much to the rest of
the code. And I doubt any browser will have trouble with 'for'
attributes pointing to a non-control element.
The for attributes in labels are used heavily in
On 11/11/06, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well. I can't see why Zope 3 has to ship with two completely different
implementations of widget rows and I don't like the formlib template
either. But this is not the code that causes validation errors.
I can't say that I like any of the
