On Sep 26, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
- Remove the broken files.
I'm not sure if this is related, but I noticed yesterday at least of
couple of eggs that we are using had been removed, in this case from
zope.org. Please, whoever is doing this, stop. If a release is
On Sep 26, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Gary Poster wrote at 2007-9-26 09:39 -0400:
...
- Remove the broken files.
I'm not sure if this is related, but I noticed yesterday at least of
couple of eggs that we are using had been removed, in this case from
zope.org. Please, whoever
On Aug 17, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: AW: relying on win32api in
windows supportofzc.zope3recipes
[...]
We're just talking about Zope here, and installing Zope into
its own buildout (possibly sharing eggs with another). This
means we
On Jul 19, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Tobias Rodäbel wrote:
Hi,
zope.app.keyreference-3.5.0_dev_r77018-py2.4.egg requires
ZODB3=3.9.0-dev-r77011
But there might be a caching problem within ZODB3-3.9.0 dev r77011,
my debug session tells:
On Jul 19, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tobias
Auftrag von Gary Poster
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2007 15:53
An: Tobias Rodäbel
[...]
zope.app.keyreference-3.5.0_dev_r77018-py2.4.egg requires
ZODB3=3.9.0-dev-r77011
But there might be a caching problem within ZODB3
On Jul 19, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Wednesday, July 18, 2007, 6:55:50 PM, I wrote:
Hello,
Seems like zc.table.column.GetterColumn does not encode the
characters
to the usual amp, lt, gt.
Is that OK this way?
I usually insert the result of the Formatter() with
div
On Jul 19, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 18 Jul 2007, at 19:25 , Kent Tenney wrote:
on my W2K machine
zopeproject MyZopeProject
fails because I don't have Visual Studio installed and it wants
to compile extensions for ZODB
Right. Something seems to depend on ZODB
On Jul 13, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Hi all!
On 4/16/07, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to
make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited
me. It would be *great* with in-Zope
On Jul 13, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/13/07, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking for recommendations and visions on how to do this
pipelining with IResults, because it's not entirely clear to us
at the
moment. Main worries are the questions of how
On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Doing proper release management can't reeally be called a waste
of time
(that would include documenting exactly what *has* changed).
Tres raises a good
On Jul 13, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/13/07, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't ask upstream to produce a thousand different
pipelineables;
the interface there needs to be dirt simple, and *always the same.*.
In particular, you can't return unicode *or* a
On Jul 5, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 10:31 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple
On Jul 4, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I originally wanted $Id$ RCS keywords in module doc strings so that
we could create tools that determined run-time version
information. Unfortunately, subversion makes using this a bit
difficult, as it doesn't update this information by
On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Markus Kemmerling wrote:
You are right, I should have provided tests for the changes right
away.
Thank you very much! The following releases have your fix.
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/zc.relationship/1.0.2 (stable, used
for ZODB 3.7/Zope 3.3/Zope 2.10)
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple zope.app.session approach to cause fewer unnecessary write
conflicts. Is this zope.app.session 3.5dev-rXXX relying on
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 03.07.2007, at 09:31, Gary Poster wrote:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that
rely on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change
allows the simple zope.app.session approach
On Jul 2, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Markus Kemmerling wrote:
Hi,
I discovered two smalll bugs in `zc.relationship`.
Thanks, I'll get those in 24 hours or so.
FWIW, generally, tests would be appreciated too, particularly of the
index. I'll make one for the index: I use that heavily and the tests
On Jul 2, 2007, at 9:42 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Thanks for reply. quick notes:
I think that in *technically* depending on a newer version
introduces a backward incompatibility. (It's like strengthening a
precondition of a method.) This is especially a problem if people
are specifying
On Jul 2, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Jul 2, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Markus Kemmerling wrote:
Hi,
I discovered two smalll bugs in `zc.relationship`.
Thanks, I'll get those in 24 hours or so.
FWIW, generally, tests would be appreciated too, particularly of
the index. I'll make
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2007-06-26 22:41:25 +0200, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Jun 23, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Log message for revision 76975:
FileWidget tries to be smarter about not deleting the
currently stored
On Jun 27, 2007, at 2:30 AM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 26.06.2007, at 21:44, Gary Poster wrote:
On Jun 26, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
i think as long the package has a dev dependency like ZODB 3.9 it
should at least have alpha or beta status
Hi Bernd.
Why?
because it pulls
On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the recent introduction of zope.app.keyreference-3.5dev with it's
dependency on ZODB 3.9 brought some issues for me as I get
conflicts in
various buildouts (e.g. z3c.zalchemy).
In my example, z3c.zalchemy doesn't care about which
On Jun 23, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Log message for revision 76975:
FileWidget tries to be smarter about not deleting the currently
stored content when the user did not upload a new file.
...
Modified: zope.app.form/trunk/src/zope/app/form/browser/textwidgets.py
Hey Christian. I intend to check in some code that fixes
zope.app.keyreference conflict error issues I wrote about last week.
This will take advantage of some code that I checked in to the ZODB,
that I don't intend to be part of ZODB 3.8--so I don't intend my
zope.app.keyreference
On Jun 21, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Jodok Batlogg wrote:
On 21.06.2007, at 22:57, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 20.06.2007, at 08:01, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
Note that adding a subitem called 'default' won't be allowed:
site_manager['default'] = object()
Traceback (most recent call
On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 12:11, Gary Poster wrote:
I understand your argument, but I'd be worried about being hosed
anyway.
This worry is logicially unjustified. :-) From the sources you gave
me to read
and the comments others provided
On Jun 13, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
Hello Gary,
I am sorry that it took me so long to respond, but I had to think
about this
problem for while and family is in town as well.
Very much understood.
On Sunday 03 June 2007 14:18, Gary Poster wrote:
Hey. I've only had
The html is very lame, btw, including, as someone pointed out to me,
a rather than a amp;. However, it shouldn't affect the
demonstration. :-)
Gary
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
On Jun 14, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Gary Poster wrote at 2007-6-13 17:12 -0400:
...
2) The second problem is less serious, ...
I doubt that this will help you much (we use such an implementation
for many years and still see quite often session related conflicts).
The reason
I've been paying some attention to ConflictErrors lately. There are
a couple of problems right now in some packages we rely on. This is
a heads up of the problems, and a chance to give me feedback on the
solutions, particularly in regards to how I should distribute them.
1)
On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:40 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Gary
Hey Roger
Betreff: Re: AW: [Zope3-dev] Re: [Checkins] SVN:
z3c.form/trunk/src/z3c/form/HTMLelement ids containing dots
are not very good, because then the
On Jun 5, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Stephan, Gary,
On Jun 5, 2007, at 3:28 AM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Stephan, Gary, Marius
Hey Roger
Agreed, we can't use different names and ids!
Cool
We can use camel bucket names instead of dots. This
means we can convert each first letter of a prefix to a
uper case letter. But the first letter
On Jun 3, 2007, at 12:58 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
Log message for revision 76258:
HTML element ids containing dots are not very good, because then the
element#id CSS selector does not work and at least in firefox the
attribute selector (element[attr=value]) does not work for the id
On May 21, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 5/21/07, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I know zc.catalog but I'm certainly not an egg expert. But
this message looks like you are maybe sharing a Python for various
installations. Are you
On May 19, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Paul Carduner wrote:
Upon a fresh checkout and make of the 3.3.0 tag of Zope3, I get the
following error:
Installed /home/pcardune/work/cando-2006/SchoolTool/Zope3/src/
zc.i18n-0.6.1dev_r72454-py2.4.egg
error: Installed distribution zc.catalog 1.2dev-r74943
On May 8, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
while moving on to Zope 3.4 beta, I had the need to assure that all
the
zope.* packages are actually working.
I investigated a couple of options and finally decided for buildout.
The result is visible here:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Giovannetti, Mark wrote:
You make a point, although I would expect a reference
implementation to be as good as possible. Hence, improvements
can be encouraged and, perhaps, the security bar raised.
Adding this salt patch allows a better, more secure reference
On Apr 20, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Compatibility with Zope 2
--
We continue to work on the transition from Zope 2 to Zope 3 by making
Zope 2 use more and more of the Zope 3 packages. But we're not there
yet. **You can't run Zope 2 applications
The IResult changes discussed on this list are in rev 74219. I
released (on http://download.zope.org/distribution/) two eggs for the
affected packages, zope.publisher and zope.app.wsgi.
I also released a 0.1 zope file egg that specifies it must use eggs
earlier than the new ones; and a
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
We would delete the private IRequest entirely, without deprecation
Sorry, IRequest in that sentence should have been IResult
Gary
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
[...]
IResult (zope/publisher/http.py, about line 600) has been the
hidden, private, don't-use-it-because-it's-going-away tool with
which you can build pipelines since before Dec. 2005
On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently
to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really
excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_.
[snip]
So
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 16 Apr 2007, at 19:09 , Gary Poster wrote:
I suppose there are four choices: (a) special case strings to make
sure they are chunked the right way; (b) expect that the adapter
result will be chunked the right way, so
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to
make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited
me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_.
IResult (zope/publisher/http.py, about line 600) has been the hidden,
private,
On Mar 17, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Nando Quintana wrote:
Hi guys,
Mikel and me are testing some zope3 features in the camp5 sprint in
North Carolina and have seen an strange behaviour on the setindex.
the 'all_of' query performs an intersection of the results got for
each value in the query.
On Feb 24, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[...]
I once mused about this and came up with rwproperty (a decorator
spelling for getters *and* setters, del'ers) and classproperty
(uses nested class statement): http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/
On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I didn't realize rwproperty was so popular. I've been wanting to
put it on the Cheeseshop since I found out about its popularity.
It's like you're reading my mind :). http://cheeseshop.python.org/
pypi/rwproperty
Awesome,
On Feb 22, 2007, at 1:57 AM, Jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Hi Roger.
zc.catalog 1.1 is stable, 1.2 is dev.
The trunk of zc.catalog, and the upcoming 1.2 release line, works
with the ZODB trunk (ZODB 3.8, Zope 3.4), which is gaining some
tools to manage the two new families
On Feb 21, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi alga
Is this mine or is there something wrong with
zc.catalog.index, BTreeAPI or?
-
self._add_value(doc_id, value)
File D:\reflineRecruiter\app\trunk\src\zc\catalog\index.py,
line 115, in _add_value values_to_documents[added] =
On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:33 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 05:17:18PM -0500, Benji York wrote:
Marius Gedminas wrote:
I have implemented a --list-modules option in a branch. It
causes the
test runner to apply package and module name filters, and then
print the
list of
On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:42 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I just stumbled over the package optionstorage. The checkin message
when this was added reads:
This is a generic solution for including editable and multi-lingual
vocbulary-like information in any
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
tests :-) ) so it seems safe from my perspective.
I was trying to apply
On Dec 20, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Gary Poster wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi again,
Gary Poster wrote:
I don't have a very strong feeling about it, but lean towards bug
fix. It didn't break any of our code (or at least any of our
On Dec 14, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
...
Zagy and I fixed this issue, by making the methods _getCurrentValue
and _getFormValue use a common method to retrieve the input value
and handle the case of converting to the form value cleanly.
However, we are not sure, whether
On Dec 18, 2006, at 2:27 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Can somebody help me classify this issue?
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev/721
I'd consider it a bug and change my original target of 3.4 to
include it
as a bugfix in 3.3 (and a backport to 3.2).
But I smell that there might be
On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Christian,
Yep, but...
What is the `good` behaviour regarding None values?
Do we need to catalog them or skip them?
Example:
If the object is (user.title == None)
Shall it be kept in the catalog or not?
In
On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello,
Two more questions remain open, but I think they are easy to answer.
In case the field is callable but the method to be called is None
Yes, remove from index.
OR
The method is not None but raises an exception while getting the
On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Gary,
At the moment it is
try:
value = value()
except:
return None
So that will eat the exception without any signs.
That makes me also glum when I have to dig deep to discover that
something ate an exception.
I propose to
On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
I propose to remove the try/except.
Is that OK?
Yes, I think removing the bare try...except is definitely the right
thing to do. (Anyone care to disagree?)
Would
On Nov 17, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Yeah, it makes me a little nervous too. I'm comfortable saying this
should go on the trunk, but I'd default to saying that it shouldn't
be backported, unless there's a groundswell of support.
Splitting up the patch
On Nov 17, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Poster wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello,
Solutions:
a: No, do not keep None values in the catalog
the current implementation works like this
you
On Nov 12, 2006, at 7:30 AM, yuppie wrote:
Hi Benji!
Benji York wrote:
yuppie wrote:
Adding additional complexity for getting the label issue
perfectly right doesn't fit much to the rest of the code. And I
doubt any browser will have trouble with 'for' attributes
pointing to a
On Oct 25, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Benji York wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
My first guess is that this is a licensing-related issue; is that
right?
I don't know, but doubt it. Both MochiKit and dojo are available
under very permissive licenses.
Right, but currently only ZC employees are
On Oct 17, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
So I'm left what the actual use for savepoints is
1) you want to reduce your memory usage within a transaction
2) a) sometimes you want to roll back to a certain point in a
transaction. b) sometimes you do this in a context of an
On Sep 29, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
...
The change from 2.4 to 2.5 is *massively* disruptive for a framework
like Zope: much more so than any change since 2.2, I think (maybe
even
2.0/2.1). The hardest bit is the change to the way the compiler
works:
On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Luis De la Parra wrote:
then we have z3c.filetype and zope.mimetype. For what I've seen,
z3c.filetype is in a better shape, but both of them seem to be
similar.
I'm not familiar with z3c.filetype. Could you (or someone else)
elaborate on the similarities,
On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi all
How drops the bforest package out of the zope package?
Do we get bforest package back or should we drop the
API doc registration too for bforest too?
Hm. I ran the tests before checking in the removal.
bforest was added in the
On Sep 11, 2006, at 5:22 PM, Florent Xicluna wrote:
Florent wrote:
I propose to patch the 'trunk' in order to allow removing of these
packages.
Here are the proposed changes:
- catch 'ImportError' when we make use of zope.app.skins
- introduce ZCML feature 'deprecatedlayers' which is 'on'
In zope/app/publisher/http.zcml we have
class class=zope.publisher.http.URLGetter
require
permission=zope.View
attributes=get __getitem__ __str__ /
/class
I think this should be zope.Public. Otherwise unauthorized users
viewing an untrusted page template will get
Anyone object if I change the testbrowser virtual host test helper
(zope.testbrowser.testing.VirtualHostTestBrowserSuite) to run the
virtual host tests on level 2?
Up side: tests that use this feature will go about twice as fast with
a normal test run, and be fine in the common case.
Down
On Aug 31, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Benji York wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Anyone object if I change the testbrowser virtual host test
helper (zope.testbrowser.testing.VirtualHostTestBrowserSuite) to
run the virtual host tests on level 2?
Sounds good to me. I suspect this should be a trunk
Zope Corporation is happy to announce a number of newly open-sourced
packages. All are in use, in development, or both.
We release these packages in the strong hope that others will
contribute to them, from maintenance through extension to
refactoring. The maintainers are effectively
On Aug 24, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Zope Corporation is happy to announce a number of newly open-
sourced packages. All are in use, in development, or both.
[snip long list]
Awesome! And thanks for this announcement! And here Infrae's with
only 3 hurry
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:56 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Michael Kerrin wrote:
I have just added a new implemation of WebDAV to svn.zope.org
...
You rock!
Yeah, I look forward to looking at this too. :-) Thanks, Michael!
...I also see that it uses zope.locking for the locking.
On Aug 21, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Sonntag, 20. August 2006 06:11 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
you might try a look at the recently released zc.async which
allows you
to
[removed Checkins mailing list--maybe we can choose one list or the
other?]
On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:03 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
And at this moment in time, Zope Corporation as far as I understand
is not bound by the same contributor's agreement we are. It's their
repository. This will
On Aug 2, 2006, at 6:03 AM, Dominik Huber wrote:
Hi Gary
Thanks for your inputs. I was also offline this days...
Gary Poster wrote:
[...]
Well, first of all, I suspect your situation, based on what I've
seen so far, looks something like this:
- code creates obj P1
- code puts P1
I checked in a test and fix tonight for http://www.zope.org/
Collectors/Zope3-dev/674 . Both worked on my Mac and my Ubuntu
systems. On buildbot, the fix didn't break any tests, but the new
test itself made two of five buildbots unhappy: one Linux slave and
one Windows slave reported
This appears to be taken care of. The pertinent parts of buildbot
are now green, after a couple of tweaks.
Gary
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Dominik Huber wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I object. :-)
Thanks for the feedback!
:-) Thanks for the really clear discussion below. I think I have a
better idea about what is going on.
BTW, I'm trying to squeeze a reply in before I (might) become
On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Dominik Huber wrote:
Hi,
Today I got a weird error caused by the __cmp__ method of
KeyReferenceToPersistent. Unfortunately I couldn't setup a
dedicated environment to reproduce the error within a test :(. The
only evidence is this traceback:
Traceback
On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hi there,
Anybody tried to use the above?
For me it raises
Module zope.app.form.utility, line 348, in getWidgetsData
Module zope.app.form.browser.widget, line 295, in getInputValue
Module zc.datetimewidget.datetimewidget, line 123, in
On Jul 17, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Adam Groszer wrote:
Hello Gary,
Sorry for the confusion, just managed it, the last one should fail.
this method normalizes datetime instances by converting them to
utc, daylight saving times are also taken into account. This
method requires an adapter
On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Vasiliev wrote:
Benji York wrote:
...
Why does the display of the default DateTime widget change?
DatetimeWidget now use zope.i18n for parse and format values so the
display is the same
On May 25, 2006, at 12:17 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote:
...
Looks good to me for 3.3 also.
+Note that a EditForm can't make use of a get_rendered method. The
get_rendered
+method does only set initial values.
This sentence got me closer to understanding what you want, at least.
Thanks
Gary
On May 24, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
...
Hooray. Now, all the moves have happened already. Does someone
know of a good and reliable way to find all the things we broke?
Sure, release 3.3 final and wait for the reports to come in. ;)
FWIW, most or all of
On May 22, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Rocky Burt wrote:
Hi all,
I was just curious why zope.schema has fields for datetime.datetime,
datetime.date, and datetime.timedelta but no field for
datetime.time. I
have a need for such a field right now and I think it'd be useful
to be
core to zope.schema
On May 17, 2006, at 9:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: Gary Poster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 22, 2006, at 11:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The formlib.EditForm dosen't catch all errors form widgets.
...
I solve the problem and added some
On May 18, 2006, at 4:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary
[...]
With your change, if the error is (or extends!) Invalid, it
is hardcoded to assume the first argument is a string,
message, or something with a reasonably __str__, translate if
it is a message, and wrap the result with a
On Apr 22, 2006, at 11:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The formlib.EditForm dosen't catch all errors form widgets.
...
Hey Roger. Your email has been sitting open on my computer for
weeks, reminding me to reply, and I want to get rid of it. :-) Did
you put a
Hey all. Seems like no-one but ZC has used zope.bforest, and it
probably fits better in the a million itsy-bitsy projects story now
that we have it (and an accompanying automated test story). Anyone
object if I move it out of the trunk?
Gary
On May 6, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Sat, 06 May 2006 21:14:57 +0100, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all. Seems like no-one but ZC has used zope.bforest, and it
probably fits better in the a million itsy-bitsy projects story
now that we have
On May 4, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:48:08PM -0400, Jim Washington wrote:
| Back in March, there was a (tiny) bit of discussion here about using
| wsgi middleware for gzipping zope3 responses.
[...]
What can I say?? NEAT! Thanks for doing this!
On May 4, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On May 4, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:48:08PM -0400, Jim Washington wrote:
| Back in March, there was a (tiny) bit of discussion here about
using
| wsgi middleware for gzipping zope3 responses
On May 1, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Please see http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2006-April/
019278.html ff.
And/or svn up your zope. ;-)
Gary
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub:
On Apr 29, 2006, at 2:57 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 4/28/06, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn proposed this be undeprecated (http://mail.zope.org/
pipermail/
zope3-dev/2005-December/016781.html) and others agreed, at least in
part. AIUI, Martijn ended up not making any
Martijn proposed this be undeprecated (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/
zope3-dev/2005-December/016781.html) and others agreed, at least in
part. AIUI, Martijn ended up not making any changes in Zope 3, but
somehow changing Zope 2 in such a way as to work around his issue.
The deprecation
On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Sam Stainsby wrote:
From looking the Zope 3 code, I suspect that the full set of
widgets is
not yet available for sources.
Yes, that is correct.
Or have I got that wrong? I see there are
some simpler widgets there that build the widgets used by
Hi all. in zope/i18n/__init__.py, the _translate method used by
translate, if the msgid is a MessageID or a Message then the domain,
default, and mapping are all used in preference to keyword arguments,
even if, for instance, the keyword is non-None and the attribute is
None.
Because of
On Apr 7, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
I have a few questions regarding the ZOPE mailer implementation:
I didn't write it. I have some pretty good guesses, though.
Hopefully the author can confirm.
1. Why did you go for a file system implementation - as ZODB objects
are being
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
