Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-09-18 Thread Dieter Maurer
Christian Zagrodnick wrote at 2007-9-18 08:35 +0200: On 2007-09-16 09:03:47 +0200, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Ok, then I suggest: * Provide an IRequestType interface in zope.publisher Does this name sound wrong? It suggests the the interface has to do with request types,

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-09-16 Thread Dieter Maurer
Christian Zagrodnick wrote at 2007-9-15 12:34 +0200: ... Ok, then I suggest: * Provide an IRequestType interface in zope.publisher Does this name sound wrong? It suggests the the interface has to do with request types, maybe browser, xmlrpc, ... It that what we want? -- Dieter

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-09-14 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
On 13.09.2007, at 18:07, Roger Ineichen wrote: Hi Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc On 13.09.2007, at 17:28, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Christian Theune wrote: Let me propose a change: 1. We revert the change. Any news on this? Yes. Over the last few days I

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-09-14 Thread Christian Theune
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 02:49 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake: On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party package, probably using ++api++. Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-09-14 Thread Christian Zagrodnick
On 14.09.2007, at 08:49, Fred Drake wrote: On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party package, probably using ++api++. Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of request; why not

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc

2007-08-27 Thread Jodok Batlogg
hi christian, On 24.08.2007, at 15:12, Stephan Richter wrote: On Friday 24 August 2007 02:37, Christian Zagrodnick wrote: The term skin is probably missleading but was taken to keep it simple. It's more an api-set. Then don't use it! Misusing a concept can lead to a lot of confusion. it's