On Friday 03 February 2006 13:19, Gary Poster wrote:
Of course, what you are proposing is exactly what Zope 3 base is, I
believe.
Yes, we certainly consider it an option.
I'd like to think that the Zope Foundation would make those splinters
less desirable.
+1
I think the most important
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 08:41, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I built such a password + confirmation widget for the Document Library
application we've been working on. It would not be difficult at all to
put this in the hurry library for others to use. Or maybe it should go
in Zope3's
Jim Fulton wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/30/06, Michael Howitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an interface with two password fields which should be equal:
class IUser(Interface):
password=zope.schema.Password(title=upassword)
password2=zope.schema.Password(title=upassword again)
On Jan 30, 2006, at 3:21 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Hi, as suggested in #zope3-dev I'll post my experiences with interface
invariants and formlib here.
I have an interface with two password fields which should be equal:
class IUser(Interface):
Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/30/06, Michael Howitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an interface with two password fields which should be equal:
class IUser(Interface):
password=zope.schema.Password(title=upassword)
password2=zope.schema.Password(title=upassword again)
Gary outlined one
On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
On 1/30/06, Michael Howitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an interface with two password fields which should be equal:
class IUser(Interface):
password=zope.schema.Password(title=upassword)
