-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gary Poster wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>>> Doing proper release management can't reeally be called a waste  
>>>> of time
>>>> (that would include documenting exactly what *has* changed).
>>> Tres raises a good point. We should continue to maintain a  
>>> CHANGES.txt or a 'Changes' section in README.txt for all zope.*  
>>> projects now. And I would recommend that others do the same with  
>>> z3c.* etc. packages.
>> Agreed.
>>
>> I recommend using a changes section in README.txt because it's  
>> tricky getting distutils to include other root-level files and I  
>> want to keep our setup scripts as simple as we can.

Distutils sucks in this regard.

> Hm (and sigh).  I was following what I thought was another Tres  
> suggestion: put CHANGES.txt in the package, and a pointer in the top  
> level to the package's version.

That is still my preference:  I think a people are more likely to find a
changelog that way.



Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGl60o+gerLs4ltQ4RAmNmAKCKQPQME/pdBN087ADCZ4suwHAHFwCgz5fi
R+elhyT0jmgcJ7ZJoD00lMU=
=x0f/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to