[Zope3-dev] Re: Putting pullparser and clientform where they belong (reverting 39890)

2006-01-15 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Brian Sutherland wrote: Since we are close to the release, I felt compelled to ask before I did this. Could I revert 39890 [1] for the 3.2 release? It seems that phillip finished zpkg's module support some time ago [2]. (I ask as this is causing me headaches doing the Debian packaging for

[Zope3-dev] Re: Putting pullparser and clientform where they belong (reverting 39890)

2006-01-10 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: | Martijn Faassen wrote: | Jim Fulton wrote: [...] | I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install | Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed | package to clobber a package that is separately packaged. Is

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Putting pullparser and clientform where they belong (reverting 39890)

2006-01-10 Thread Jim Fulton
Derrick Hudson wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: | Martijn Faassen wrote: | Jim Fulton wrote: [...] | I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install | Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed | package to clobber a package that is

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Putting pullparser and clientform where they belong (reverting 39890)

2006-01-10 Thread Brian Sutherland
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:27:18AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, wrt versions, it seems to be a common practice to treat different versions as separate packages. For example, on my Ubuntu system, Berkeley DB 4.2 and 4.3 are treated as separate (sets of) packages. Yes it is common, but the