On 1/3/06, Wade Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope
3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-)
Or at least almost as easily as in RoR or Django. TTW is not a
requirement; Chris McDonough's TTB posting was right on
--On 29. Dezember 2005 10:08:03 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2
scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also
using the skins tool). In Z3 you have to restart the server
Andreas Jung wrote:
To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope
3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-)
-aj
I'd go further and say regular developers should be able to develop
faster with Zope 3 by having automatic reloading in most python modules
in debug mode :-)
-
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 29. Dezember 2005 10:08:03 -0330 Rocky Burt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2
scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also
using the skins tool). In Z3 you
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 15:40 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
What I am saying: don't take away feature that are useful for a particular
kind of coders and for a particular way of coding. Don't take away a feature
_just_ to enforce a certain way to do programming.
+1 to Andreas.
-1 to the
Andreas Jung wrote:
Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2
scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also
using the skins tool). In Z3 you have to restart the server at least for
view classes (but not for templates).
Personally I would say
