Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 10:31 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple zope.app.session approach to cause fewer unnecessary write
On Jul 5, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.07.2007, 10:31 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2007, 09:43 +0300 schrieb Gary Poster:
However, did the tree just grow a dependency on zope.minmax as well?
Yes and no. I made a zope.app.session 3.4 branch with no
dependencies on zope.minmax. That is what the tree currently uses.
The tree also
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that rely
on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change allows the
simple zope.app.session approach to cause fewer unnecessary write
conflicts. Is this zope.app.session 3.5dev-rXXX relying on
On 03.07.2007, at 09:31, Gary Poster wrote:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that
rely on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change
allows the simple zope.app.session approach to cause fewer
unnecessary write conflicts. Is this
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Bernd Dorn wrote:
On 03.07.2007, at 09:31, Gary Poster wrote:
Christian et al:
What do you want in regards to the zope.app.session changes that
rely on the new package zope.minmax? Very briefly, the change
allows the simple zope.app.session approach to
