Christian Theune wrote: waiting for some unit tests I saw that mail and went over the terms in there. I don't know the state of discussion but I'd prefer some different terms: Thanks for your comments, Christian. I wonder if this is the right place to discuss. Maybe a comment to the wiki page
Derrick Hudson wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:54:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: | Derrick Hudson wrote: | | On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:07:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: | | | What I don't like about annotations is that the information is stored on | | the object itself. | |
Ruslan Spivak wrote: Hello. For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit' benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup: http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c There is also test script attached there. By my
Benji York wrote: Ruslan Spivak wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch.
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: ... I think we should see to it that in cases of parallel implementations, unit tests are set up to run twice, once for the Python implementation and once for the C one. That way, by the rule of checking in no code that produces unit