Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-31 Thread Shane Hathaway
Jim Fulton wrote: I could certainly find evidence that you tried, but the implementation was actually buffering data in a string buffer until the request was finished. This was the case at least as early as spring of 2004. Even with more than 105 bytes output over a slow connection?

[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Get classes implementing Interface

2005-12-31 Thread Florian Lindner
Does anyone got this mail? I've not received a copy from the mailinglists neither it shows up in the archives... Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 20:57 schrieb Jeff Shell: On 12/30/05, Florian Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 17:45 schrieb Jim Fulton: Philipp von

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-31 Thread Jim Fulton
Shane Hathaway wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I could certainly find evidence that you tried, but the implementation was actually buffering data in a string buffer until the request was finished. This was the case at least as early as spring of 2004. Even with more than 105 bytes output

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-31 Thread Shane Hathaway
Jim Fulton wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: A pull strategy will be efficient for a lot more people. I don't know what you mean by this. I mean that the new strategy of sending open files to the publisher, which I call a pull strategy, will work better than pushing to temporary files. Which