Brian Sutherland wrote:
Log message for revision 68639: A basic makefile, the ZPL and copyright headers.
Is there consensus about adding makefiles like this (diff below)? I personally don't like the idea, but I wanted to bring it up to the list.
I don't like them for a couple of reasons. First, they're make files; that's an automatic strike :). Second, they're not useful cross-platform; if what they're doing is important, then they should be Python scripts, if not, then they shouldn't exist. Third, /I/ don't value what they're doing for me.
Other opinions?
-=- Added: zc.resourcelibrary/trunk/Makefile =================================================================== --- zc.resourcelibrary/trunk/Makefile 2006-06-15 00:16:40 UTC (rev 68638) +++ zc.resourcelibrary/trunk/Makefile 2006-06-15 00:23:01 UTC (rev 68639) @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +PYVERS=2.4 + +all: + # nothing for now + +clean: $(PYVERS:%=clean-python%) + rm -rf dist + rm -rf build + rm -rf src/*.egg-info + +clean-python%: + python$* setup.py clean + +.PHONY: dist +dist: clean $(PYVERS:%=build-python%-egg) + python setup.py sdist + +build-python%-egg: + python$* setup.py bdist_egg
-- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
