[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope3-Users] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Benji York wrote: Stephan's ZSCP proposal suggests using the package name z3c for community packages. IOW, packages that aren't part of a larger collection like lovely.*, zc.*, etc.. There are currently several z3c packages in existence. The zope3.org packages currently use the package

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Stephan Richter wrote: [snip] Also, z3c does not try to be the holy grail of community work. It is just another namespace and I think this should be accepted. I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a common namespace for community work. For such a common

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: proposal: error reporting unification

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, I think the fix has some steps in it: * first, delegate everything to a IErrorReportingUtility and let it log to SiteError as well. The SiteError logging policy is not operative anymore. * it turns out the current IErrorReportingUtility does have some form of filtering policy - it

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a common namespace for community work. For such a common namespace z3c is a bit unwieldier than something like zorg. We could consider establishing a more coherent pattern

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Lennart Regebro wrote: On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a common namespace for community work. For such a common namespace z3c is a bit unwieldier than something like zorg. We could consider establishing a

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Olivier Grisel
Martijn Faassen a écrit : Technically it isn't a problem, that's why it's not at all essential. But it might be nice for some other reasons: * people who write a new community package knows which namespace to use * we could present this to the outside world a bit more coherently; look at

[Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hi there, I just noticed the existence of zope.etree. Besides a minor comment on its use of 'zope' as the namespace package, which I believe is generally reserved for core components, I have the following more conceptual comment: There are currently three implementations of the ElementTree

Re: [Zope3-dev] Riddle: zope.interface versus zope.formlib

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Withers
Stephan Richter wrote: I provided the troubling code in the original mail. You can also see my checkin from last night to look at a fix. I think my tests demonstrate the issue well. Sorry, I unsubscribe from the lists when on holiday so I likely missed it... Before playing with it, I would

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Technically it isn't a problem, that's why it's not at all essential. But it might be nice for some other reasons: * people who write a new community package knows which namespace to use * we could present this to the outside world a bit

[Zope3-dev] z3c - be or not to be

2006-08-25 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi to all Zope3 Visionairs ;-) CC: to some of the z3c namespace chooser which are to busy to answer, flying back to Boston or are at holiday this week ;-) Yes, I didn't do much for Zope3 core the last couple month, except publishing to z3c. But as on of the initiator of z3c I need to give a

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Kerrin
Hi Martijn, On Friday 25 August 2006 16:33, Martijn Faassen wrote: I just noticed the existence of zope.etree. Besides a minor comment on its use of 'zope' as the namespace package, which I believe is generally reserved for core components, I have the following more conceptual comment: What

Fwd: Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Kerrin
I am not a PyPy sprint in Limerick and get seem to send mail - so I will try again. Hi Martijn, On Friday 25 August 2006 16:33, Martijn Faassen wrote: I just noticed the existence of zope.etree. Besides a minor comment on its use of 'zope' as the namespace package, which I believe is

Re: Fwd: Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Kerrin
Sorry for the duplicate mails - it turns out I can send mail it is just terrible slow. Michael -- Michael Kerrin 55 Fitzwilliam Sq., Dublin 2. Tel: 087 688 3894 ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub:

Re: Fwd: Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Benji York
Michael Kerrin wrote: I am not a PyPy sprint in Limerick Good to know. -- Benji York Senior Software Engineer Zope Corporation ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub:

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Fred Drake
On 8/25/06, Michael Kerrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What name should I use, I have seen a lot of talk on this but never really followed any of the threads to the end. If you say use X I will. I don't want to start another thread on this. I think the name is fine. There are packages under zope

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Kerrin
On Friday 25 August 2006 18:10, Fred Drake wrote: On 8/25/06, Michael Kerrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What name should I use, I have seen a lot of talk on this but never really followed any of the threads to the end. If you say use X I will. I don't want to start another thread on this. I

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Fred Drake wrote: On 8/25/06, Michael Kerrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What name should I use, I have seen a lot of talk on this but never really followed any of the threads to the end. If you say use X I will. I don't want to start another thread on this. I think the name is fine. There are

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.etree comments

2006-08-25 Thread Fred Drake
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also wonder how easy it is to install something that's not shipped with the core into the core. From where I sit (behind fancy buildout systems!), it's just as easy to add another separately-developed zope.something package as it is to add

Re: [Zope3-dev] Riddle: zope.interface versus zope.formlib

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Shell
On 8/23/06, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, today I found a nice brain teaser. What is the outcome of the following: from zope.interface import Interface from zope.schema import TextLine class IFoo(Interface): ... title = TextLine() ... class IBar(IFoo): ...

Re: [Zope3-dev] z3c vs. the zorg

2006-08-25 Thread Baiju M
+1 for zorg 3 is an unlucky number, it should be killed sooner or later :) -- Baiju M ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com