Hello,
Somehow relevant to the subject I just found an article on Wickert's
site:
http://www.wiggy.net/ , Using a seperate Data.fs for the catalog
--
Best regards,
Groszer Adam
--
Quote of the day:
Keep your fears for yourself, but share your courage with others.
- Robert Louis Stevenson
Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreibt:
Yeah, and I do need to be cross-platform with this, so inodes are not
ideal.
Hi,
it depends on how cross-platform you need to be and whether you have
another solution that is ideal;)
For Win32 you can use the low value of the FileIndex number of the
Adam Groszer wrote:
Somehow relevant to the subject I just found an article on Wickert's
site:
http://www.wiggy.net/ , Using a seperate Data.fs for the catalog
The win here is actually partitioning the object cache...
Similar wins could be achieved without making backup/pack/etc more
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 Linux zc-buildbot.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 709
Blamelist: dobe
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 709
Blamelist: dobe
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Zope3-dev
Hey Christian,
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 01:12 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
[snip]
Quick shot on integrating the suggestion from Uwe:
- Reserve an OID from the ZODB storage, maybe create a 'shadow' object
in the ZODB.
- Use a directory that maintains a hard
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 18:05 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hey Christian,
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 01:12 +0200 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
[snip]
Quick shot on integrating the suggestion from Uwe:
- Reserve an OID from the ZODB storage, maybe
