Hj Jeff,
Okay - I'd like to restate my position. :-)
I think you're right - having different names for each release (Zope 3.2 = Blah, Zope 3.3 = Foo) *is* a bad idea, it creates confusion, especially in a framework with frequent releases. So -1 on that from me from now on. :)
However...
Jeff
Max M wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 2/7/06, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it would only make people go What, first Zope 2, then Zope 3, now
Zope Zimba? thinking it's three different things.
But always writing it Zope3 might be helpful.
Telling that there is a difference
Max M wrote:
If you want to fix the Zope 2 website at the same time as branding Zope
3, I fear it is a monumental task that will never happen.
The Zope 2 website is so big, and has so much content that it should
have somebody working on it full time if it needs changing.
Perhaps this
Martijn Faassen wrote:
If we do manage to build a new website and are a good way done with it,
*then* is the time to discuss possible branding options.
... except if that website is to incorporate a given brand and have a big launch. :)
But you're absolutely right - presenting it properly,
