Jim Fulton wrote:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
I really like it. Of course we can do it without new syntax (unless I'm
missing something), but the syntax would
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
- Suppose that we always had access to the latest released version,
- Suppose that, within a major release, all releases were
On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:25, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
I really like it. Of course we can do it without new syntax
Ah,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
[...]
Ah, I think it's a good idea. And it would still allow
On May 31, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 10:56 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Would a requirement of foobar 2.1* mean every stable release of
foobar 2.1 and all micro versions?
I don't understand your question.
The intention was to find out
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 11:12 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On May 31, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 10:56 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Would a requirement of foobar 2.1* mean every stable release of
foobar 2.1 and all micro versions?
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 10:12 -0400:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
- Suppose that we always had access to the latest released version,
- Suppose that, within
On 31.05.2007, at 20:08, Dieter Maurer wrote:
I fear my colleagues responsible to maintain the productive versions
would not be happy:
They want the system to be as stable as possible.
If they need to introduce a new component, they usually
prefer to just add this one component. Only
On May 31, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 10:12 -0400:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
- Suppose that we always had access to
--On 31. Mai 2007 20:08:02 +0200 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 10:12 -0400:
In thinking about how we might specify that we want to depend on
major versions but sometimes need to specify minimum versions, the
following occurred to me:
- Suppose that we
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 14:15 -0400:
...
I fear my colleagues responsible to maintain the productive versions
would not be happy:
They want the system to be as stable as possible.
If they need to introduce a new component, they usually
prefer to just add this one component.
On May 31, 2007, at 2:47 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-31 14:15 -0400:
...
I fear my colleagues responsible to maintain the productive versions
would not be happy:
They want the system to be as stable as possible.
If they need to introduce a new component, they
12 matches
Mail list logo
