[Zope3-dev] Re: AW: relying on win32api in windows support ofzc.zope3recipes

2007-08-17 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey Roger, Roger Ineichen wrote: [snip] Was the original way to run Zope 3 trunk dependent on win32api? I guess, but I'm not sure; Python 2.5 includes ctypes which could be used as a replacement for the win32 part. I am fine with requiring win32api, though it'd be better if it were indeed

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: AW: relying on win32api in windows support ofzc.zope3recipes

2007-08-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 8/17/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am fine with requiring win32api, though it'd be better if it were indeed installable from the python package index. Otherwise you need to tell people to install two things (Python and win32api) instead of one thing on Windows in order to

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: AW: relying on win32api in windows support ofzc.zope3recipes

2007-08-17 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, On 8/17/07, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/17/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am fine with requiring win32api, though it'd be better if it were indeed installable from the python package index. Otherwise you need to tell people to install two things

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: AW: relying on win32api in windows support ofzc.zope3recipes

2007-08-17 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 8/17/07, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If an egg is the only way to install dependencies, then I would say that buildout needs more work. From what I understand it would be extremely hard to eggify pywin32. It's not the only way, but it's definitely the preferred way. A