Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
It'd be a lot easier. You'd still have to list it for all eggs that
you depend on directly. It would be nice if this could be automated as
well, as being in two places to add a single dependency is more work
than being
Hi Tres and Martijn. I apologize for the length of this post in advance.
I have been spending a bit of time on app buildouts over the past days.
What I have learned about some of this is that there are a couple of
ways to configure apps with pluses and minuses.
There are also major
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 22, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Pratt wrote:
...
In looking at the way I am developing, my goals are package reuse
and thin glue in an app package (that is also the app egg) to bind
packages to make an application
On Apr 22, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't think this is necessary. An egg that has ZCML should load
the ZCML from other eggs it depends on. This means that these eggs
have to be designed this way.
Our override story is too weak to support this now, because the author
of
On Apr 22, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Pratt wrote:
...
In looking at the way I am developing, my goals are package reuse
and thin glue in an app package (that is also the app egg) to bind
packages to make an application consisting mostly of installation,
security, testing and perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hello,
Tres Seaver wrote:
David Pratt wrote:
On the basis that eggs spell out dependencies, I am thinking the
inclusion of packages and their dependencies should be enough to dictate
the sequence of inclusion for
