Brian Sutherland wrote:
> Since we are close to the release, I felt compelled to ask before I did
> this. Could I revert 39890 [1] for the 3.2 release?
>
> It seems that phillip finished zpkg's module support some time ago [2].
>
> (I ask as this is causing me headaches doing the Debian packaging
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:27:18AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
> BTW, wrt versions, it seems to be a common practice to treat different
> versions as separate packages. For example, on my Ubuntu system,
> Berkeley DB 4.2 and 4.3 are treated as separate (sets of) packages.
Yes it is common, but the m
Derrick Hudson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Martijn Faassen wrote:
| >Jim Fulton wrote:
[...]
| >>I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install
| >>Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed
| >>package to clobber a package that
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Martijn Faassen wrote:
| >Jim Fulton wrote:
[...]
| >>I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install
| >>Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed
| >>package to clobber a package that is separately packaged.