[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-24 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Florent Guillaume wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: If people don't like the 'browser2' prefix, I'm open to other suggestions. For all I care, the three directives I suggested could be on the 'browser'

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-24 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 4/24/06, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we don't adopt a new namespace, perhaps 'browser:published'would serve as a 'nominalized adjective noun form of 'browser:publish'. one is called pageTemplate, how aboot calling the other pageAttribute? -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the naming browser2:page vs. browser:publish vs. ... is not that important as the original name browser:page can be reintruduced (with the meaning of the new concept) after the deprecation period, i. e. I am thinking of having two

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the naming browser2:page vs. browser:publish vs. ... is not that important as the original name browser:page can be reintruduced (with the meaning of the new

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement is allowed, and only after that to reintroduce the old statment with a new meaning. Yes, so you suggest

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement is allowed, and only after that to

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Lennart Regebro wrote: On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement is allowed, and only after that to reintroduce the old statment with a new meaning.

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Andreas Reuleaux wrote: On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement is allowed, and

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Florent Guillaume
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: If people don't like the 'browser2' prefix, I'm open to other suggestions. For all I care, the three directives I suggested could be on the 'browser' namespace, only browser2:page and browser:page clash. So perhaps browser2:page should be named something else.

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-23 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Florent Guillaume wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: If people don't like the 'browser2' prefix, I'm open to other suggestions. For all I care, the three directives I suggested could be on the 'browser' namespace, only browser2:page and browser:page clash. So perhaps browser2:page should

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-22 Thread Florent Guillaume
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Thanks to everyone who commented on the first versions of this proposal. People seem to object changing the old directives. I respect that. I've therefore changed the proposal to introduce *new* directives. See http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/TheBrowserPageCompromise

[Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-22 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Florent Guillaume wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Thanks to everyone who commented on the first versions of this proposal. People seem to object changing the old directives. I respect that. I've therefore changed the proposal to introduce *new* directives. See

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Update: The browser:page compromise

2006-04-22 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:28:35PM +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Thanks to everyone who commented on the first versions of this proposal. People seem to object changing the old directives. I respect that. I've therefore changed the proposal to introduce