page postprocessing (was Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: XUL, DHTML)
On Dec 13, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Benji York wrote: Jeff Shell wrote: I think there was a proposal for smart widgets that could require Javascript but have the supporting Javascript library loaded only once..? What's become of that? That sounds like zope.resourcelibrary (http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/ResourceLibrary). We're using it in products and the proposal had enough support to get into 3.2 but a combination of Jim not liking some implementation details... The answer we expected to give to the improved implementation details hinged on the page postprocessing proposal Jim made. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2005-September/015812.html http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/PublicationPostProcessing My impression is that Jim felt that this didn't fly: there was not enough feedback for him to proceed. I may misunderstand. In any case, it didn't happen. Anyone want to take up the ball in the conversation again? Personally, I wanted to just put exactly what Jim discussed into place and see where it led. I was afraid that too much discussion of what we ought to do and well if we do X, then we should Y would kill it: we should just do the proposal, and *then* discover what we ought to do. Bueller? Gary ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: page postprocessing (was Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: XUL, DHTML)
On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Gary Poster wrote: I sent this out too hastily. See below. The answer we expected to give to the improved implementation details hinged on the page postprocessing proposal Jim made. It was not a proposal, but a brainstorm. http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2005-September/015812.html http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/PublicationPostProcessing My impression is that Jim felt that this didn't fly: there was not enough feedback for him to proceed. I may misunderstand. I don't think we proceeded past brainstorm to proposal. In any case, it didn't happen. Anyone want to take up the ball in the conversation again? Personally, I wanted to just put exactly what Jim discussed into place and see where it led. ... My position should perhaps be taken at least as a straw man. I'd like to see something like this worked out. I suppose I should try to come up with some details, concerns, or solutions on the basis of Jim's document, and work them out here. How about some other people do that too? :-) Gary ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
