-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Theune wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 10.01.2007, 11:04 -0500 schrieb Benji York: >> Christian Theune wrote: >>> I propose to add an "ultimate" pop at the beginning of each test, to >>> ensure consistency/isolation at those points. >> Where "ultimate pop" means to remove all stacked demostorages added by >> previous tests? If so, sounds good. >> >> I do worry a little about that hiding mismatched push/pop operations in >> non-failing tests. Perhaps the "ultimate pop" could generate a selenium >> error if there was anything there to pop. > > I think that would defeat the purpose of having the other tests pass and > not get spurious errors.
If pushing / popping demostorages is done by code in the tests themselves, then failure to clean up afterwards is failture (like failing to reset the component architecture). > I think under normal conditions, the mismatched operations shouldn't be > a problem, anyway, normal users of zc.selenium shouldn't have to worry > about it. All of those operations are generated automatically anyway. Then why do we need the "utlimate" pop, if not to catch a programmer error? Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpRJk+gerLs4ltQ4RAl6PAJ48i8iblJ4vuqi7SwezauKRJe8JkACgtud4 tqvDHPMr2Jyxnx82vuuwjHY= =GAxS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
