Roger Ineichen wrote at 2006-8-25 18:27 +0200:
...
The reason why;
We really have no time to do this in the next couple of
month. And the option sombody else doing it is also *NO*
option because we have allready productive projects build
on this libraries and have no time to migrate them for
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
Also, z3c
does not try to be the holy grail of community work. It is just another
namespace and I think this should be accepted.
I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a
common namespace for community work. For such a common
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a
common namespace for community work. For such a common namespace z3c
is a bit unwieldier than something like zorg. We could consider
establishing a more coherent pattern
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually think it would be *nice*, if not at all essential, to have a
common namespace for community work. For such a common namespace z3c
is a bit unwieldier than something like zorg. We could consider
establishing a
Martijn Faassen a écrit :
Technically it isn't a problem, that's why it's not at all essential.
But it might be nice for some other reasons:
* people who write a new community package knows which namespace to use
* we could present this to the outside world a bit more coherently; look
at
On 8/25/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technically it isn't a problem, that's why it's not at all essential.
But it might be nice for some other reasons:
* people who write a new community package knows which namespace to use
* we could present this to the outside world a bit
Hi to all Zope3 Visionairs ;-)
CC: to some of the z3c namespace chooser which are
to busy to answer, flying back to Boston or are at
holiday this week ;-)
Yes, I didn't do much for Zope3 core the last couple month,
except publishing to z3c. But as on of the initiator of
z3c I need to give a
+1 for zorg
3 is an unlucky number, it should be killed sooner or later :)
--
Baiju M
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Stephan's ZSCP proposal suggests using the package name z3c for
community packages. IOW, packages that aren't part of a larger
collection like lovely.*, zc.*, etc.. There are currently several z3c
packages in existence.
The zope3.org packages currently use the package name zorg. I
On Thursday 24 August 2006 16:54, Benji York wrote:
Stephan's ZSCP proposal suggests using the package name z3c for
community packages. IOW, packages that aren't part of a larger
collection like lovely.*, zc.*, etc.. There are currently several z3c
packages in existence.
The zope3.org
On 8/24/06, Benji York [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If zc were to become zope community, I'd be *totally* for it (but I
don't speak for ZC here, so that may not be cool with others, like say
Jim). We'd either keep using zc under the new meaning, or switch to
something else.
z3c clearly stands for
11 matches
Mail list logo