Stephan Richter wrote at 2007-10-6 13:40 -0400:
...
I personally feel quiet offended to see Zope 3 degraded to a set of
components. Zope 3 in itself is also an application server; Zope 2, on the
other hand, is an application.
Maybe, but then Zope 2 is an application with variants that are
not
Hi Andreas
What do you man by two development paradigms?
Please don't build a wall between Zope 2 and Zope 3
developers. Most old-school Zope 2 developers are doing
development also with Zope 3 components and Zope 3
techniques. Look at Plone 3.0 and its heavy usage of Zope 3
--On 6. Oktober 2007 18:24:45 +0200 Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andreas
What do you man by two development paradigms?
Please don't build a wall between Zope 2 and Zope 3
developers. Most old-school Zope 2 developers are doing
development also with Zope 3 components and Zope
On Saturday 06 October 2007 13:14, Andreas Jung wrote:
You are using 7 times the term Zope2 and 9 times Zope 3
and also Plone 3.0 in this small text. Can you try to describe
this without 2 or 3 in Zope *? I guess not, right?
s/Zope 2/Zope application server
s/Zope 3/Zope components
I
