Hi Adam, Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Adam Groszer > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 4:27 PM > To: Jim Fulton > Cc: zope3-dev > Subject: Re[2]: [Zope3-dev] possible bug in zope.wfmc > > Hello Jim, > > My specific usecase is: > > --------- > ----->| Final | > ---------- / --------- > ...-->| Update |- --------- > ---------- \----->| Issue |-->... > ^ \ --------- > | \ ---------- > | \-->| Review | > | ---------- > | | > +------------------+ > > Update -> Final is guarded by "review_result == 'accepted'" > Update -> Issue is guarded by "transitionName == 'update_issue'" > Update -> Review is guarded by "transitionName == 'update_review'" > On the UI I put up every possible transition. Now if my crazy > user chooses Final if review_result != 'accepted' then bang, > the process gets finished. No errors, no messages, no exceptions. > I already thought of filtering the possible transitions on > the UI, but how? transitionName still forces the other > conditions to false. A kind of transition-precondition is not > available as I know. > In this usecase raising an exception and thus not letting any > transition to fire fits me perfectly.
Is this (Update -> Final) not a end transaction? Do you mean that the end transaction concept istn't correct working? > XPDL would give the options > - exception > - default exception > - otherwise > but none of these are implemented in zope.wfmc. > > I think finishing the whole process is definitely bad behaviour. > But what's correct? Please give a hint what should be done. Sorry, I don't know. but I agree that it should be a difference if we finsih a transaction with a Fslse or True guard. Regards Roger Ineichen > Monday, September 11, 2006, 4:00:01 PM, you wrote: > > JF> On Sep 10, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Adam Groszer wrote: > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I think I found a bug in zope.wfmc. > >> Let's say the Review>Publish and Review>Reject transitions are > >> guarded by conditions. > >> ----------- > >> -->| Publish | > >> ---------- ---------- / ----------- > >> | Author |-->| Review |- ---------- > >> ---------- ---------- \-->| Reject | > >> ---------- > >> > >> If at Review.workItemFinished() both conditions are still > _FALSE_ the > >> wfmc package finishes the whole process. > >> I think the correct behaviour should be to not to allow to > finish the > >> workitem. > > JF> I don't think that would be correct. > > > >> Maybe an exception should be raised? > > JF> You can actually model that in xpdl using an exception, > although I > JF> don't reflect off-hand if that is supported in zope.wfmc. > > JF> Jim > > JF> -- > JF> Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Python Powered! > JF> CTO (540) 361-1714 > http://www.python.org > JF> Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com > http://www.zope.org > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Groszer Adam > -- > Quote of the day: > Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized > nations. - Thomas Jefferson - > > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-dev mailing list > Zope3-dev@zope.org > Unsub: > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/dev%40projekt01.ch > > _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
