On 7/26/05, sureshvv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me thinks the error message is pretty broken! Or is that now considered a PT > feature? ;)
I'll grant that it's less than ideal, but not broken by HTML standards. The <p> in the original source is closed by an implied </p> where the <ul> starts, so while it's not broken as far as compliance with the specification is concerned, it is confusing. Adding logic to separate this case from a more obvious unbalanced tag problem just doesn't seem a high priority to me, but I'll certainly consider patches to the PT compiler to improve the situation. That's a pretty tricky bit of code, unfortunately. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
