Christian Theune wrote at 2006-12-17 11:34 +0100:
> ...
>Jupp. Is there any technical chance the we can use the deprecation mechanism
>or something like this to inform developers that they are not fully
>complying to a changed contract?
>
>Still, for me it feels like the original interface should h
On Sun, December 17, 2006 10:27 am, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote at 2006-12-11 08:30 +0100:
>> ...
>>> Both are not acceptable, especially option #1. We can't just change
>>> existing contracts as we see fit.
>>
>>Right. However, I think it's possible to regard this is a bug in the
Christian Theune wrote at 2006-12-11 08:30 +0100:
> ...
>> Both are not acceptable, especially option #1. We can't just change
>> existing contracts as we see fit.
>
>Right. However, I think it's possible to regard this is a bug in the
>original contract.
But, some adapters for "IAnnotations" may
Good Morning,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> In the issue you write:
>
>> I can see two ways:
>>
>> 1. Extend the IAnnotations interface to grow the necessary
>> methods and support the existing use cases
>>
>> 2. Remove the ability from the existing attribute annotation
>> and re-write t
