Rob Jeschofnik wrote:
I am negative [insert some large integer here].
I absolutely could not care about Zope 2 development issues. That is why
I subscribed to Zope3-dev. Zope 2 and Zope 3 are very different animals,
and I cannot see any reason to merge their discussions.
So you think Zope 2
On Friday 17 February 2006 23:54, Jim Fulton wrote:
Only you and Philipp were excited about this. Not sure that
constitutes a ringing endorsement. Maybe others will chime in now.
I'm +10 too.
I'd like to see this happen before the end of the year.
-1. I only change my vote, if the
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make
people not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by zope-dev.
Okay, who
Gary Poster wrote:
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make people
not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by
if we're voting, I'm +0.
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Gary Poster wrote:
On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:26 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We'd have to declare the zope3-dev list for obsolete and make people
not
send messages to it. We'd just have to define a date and time. All
subsequent mail traffic would be handled by
