On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:56:41PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jim Fulton wrote: > > Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >> Previously Andrew Bennetts wrote: > >>> The real problem as you noted in your original message is that > >>> there's no way to > >>> distinguish between a pyc file that is only intended to be used as a > >>> cache of > >>> bytecode for a py file, and a pyc file that is intended to be used > >>> standalone. > >> > >> Isn't the existing or non-existing of a corresponding .py file a good > >> indication? > > > > No, because you may have intended to remove the module. > > Marking the directories containing the sourceless .pyc files as readonly > would be a reasonable workaround: if your forgot the '-k', the > testrunner would just whine and halt.
Good point. Thanks, Tres. I think Chris' idea might have merit too, but I don't really have time to hack on testrunner. For now, I'm just going to run tests with a wrapper script. -- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com