On Sunday 09 October 2005 11:07, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > That changes a bit the way tests are to be called.
>
> This is a fairly significant change to make without a proposal.
Right.
> I would expect that there are a number of documentation resources
> that would need to change as well.
Darn, I di
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
A better change would be to arrange for the root directory to be excluded
from the Python path. In general, any script we use should, by default,
exclude its directory from sys.path.
Maybe this only turns up if you have a package layout where the
__i
Jim Fulton wrote:
A better change would be to arrange for the root directory to be excluded
from the Python path. In general, any script we use should, by default,
exclude its directory from sys.path.
Maybe this only turns up if you have a package layout where the
__init__.py is in the same p
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I have renamed 'test.py' in the trunk to 'testrunner.y' to avoid name
collision, i.e. to be able to import python test module.
This is a fairly significant change to make without a proposal.
It is indeed. This should be reverted until more discussion and
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hi,
FYI,
Until Python let us do relative/absolute imports (the future statement),
I have renamed 'test.py' in the trunk to 'testrunner.y' to avoid name
collision, i.e. to be able to import python test module.
>
That changes a bit the way tests are to be called.
This is a
