Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Uwe Oestermeier
Hi, I'm currently working on zope.fssync and zope.app.fssync. There are still some things to do (e.g. changing the API of the default file serialization adapter to read and write methods, adding security statements for serializers and deserializers). I'm planning to finish these things until 3.4.

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Fred Drake
On 3/6/07, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have distributed zope.app.file with Zope 3.3 so zope.app.file should be distributed with zope.app egg when Zope 3.4 is released. And we are not distributed zope.fssync with Zope 3.3, but now zope.fssync is dependency for zope.app.file . The

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Baiju M
Fred Drake wrote: On 3/6/07, Baiju M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have distributed zope.app.file with Zope 3.3 so zope.app.file should be distributed with zope.app egg when Zope 3.4 is released. And we are not distributed zope.fssync with Zope 3.3, but now zope.fssync is dependency for

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 6, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Baiju M wrote: Hi, We have distributed zope.app.file with Zope 3.3 so zope.app.file should be distributed with zope.app egg when Zope 3.4 is released. And we are not distributed zope.fssync with Zope 3.3, but now zope.fssync is dependency for zope.app.file

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Uwe Oestermeier wrote: ... My preference would be to leave everthing as it is That's not possible, as we're changing out packaging technology. (See my separate note to Baiju.) and include zope.fssync as a dependency and zope.app.fssync as a part of the egg.

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Uwe Oestermeier
Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We need to either remove zope.app.fssync.file, or, if we think that fssync is moving along well enough, we need to move zope.app.ffile.fssync to a separate project in some namespace package, such as zope.app.filefssync. fssync is too experimental to

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mar 6, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Uwe Oestermeier wrote: ... Given that zope.app.fssync needs more work, wouldn't it be better to move everything into one place then, e.g to zope.app.fssync.file, zope.app.fssync.zptpage etc? If the API becomes stable we still can create the separate projects.

Re: [Zope3-dev] zope.fssync dependency on zope.app.file

2007-03-06 Thread Uwe Oestermeier
Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since you're the one working on this, I'll defer to you on this detail. :) Ok, then I will move the things to zope.app.fssync. Uwe Dr. Uwe Oestermeier Institut für Wissensmedien Knowledge