[Zope3-Users] URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-19 Thread Jim Fulton
When we refactored the Zope 3 pubisher to work more closely with WSGI, we decided to remove the response.write method. We should have written a proposal for this, but we failed to do so. Over the last few weeks there has been much discussion of this in which I asserted many times that I didn't

[Zope3-Users] Re: URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-19 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: When we refactored the Zope 3 pubisher to work more closely with WSGI, we decided to remove the response.write method. We should have written a proposal for this, but we failed to do so. Over the last few weeks there has been

[Zope3-Users] Re: [Zope3-dev] URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-19 Thread Jeff Shell
I was using it in some custom views for HurryFile based images. I've removed it since I started testing our code against Zope 3.2. Right now I just return the hurryfile binary data with a return statement (one big chunk), but am looking forward to knowing how to return long output. On 12/19/05,

[Zope3-Users] Re: URGENT RFC: Is anyone using response.write in Zope 3?

2005-12-19 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeff Shell wrote: Yes, it's hurry.file. What's Tramline? We're using hurry.file for small images, generally, and it's been working fine. We've recently written a cache manager that writes the images out to the file system where Apache can serve