Thanks Philipp! I suspect your first suggested solution will probably
be the one that makes sense for us, but I will have to do a little
experimentation to be sure. It's very useful that you are able to
actually pick out the interfaces and interface methods that are of
concern to me.
This
Hello,
I finally managed to access local components from zope.scheduler, but I felt to
another, even worse trouble.
In the zope.scheduler task I create and/or update some local objects, but then I
fall into the following exception:
'exceptions.TypeError: can't pickle Checker objects' in
Many people have offered approaches. I find the simplest and
cleanest approach for declaring interfaces is as follows:
class IContactList(IContainer):
contains('.IContact')
class IContact(Interface):
...schema fields...
class IContactContained(IContained):
Hi all,
I am programming on zope2.9, and it is a bit large project which contains
many zope objects, such as, External Method, Python Script, and DTML
Document. I wish I can manage my zope source as a group of files, rather
than a group of objects in Zope. Actually I need create new objects
On 13 Feb 2007, at 10:51 , David Johnson wrote:
I'm trying to understand this situation also since we face it
frequently. The PAU has a Group Folder which works well in this
regard. Would the idea of extending Groups in the PAU to include
any person in the ldap directory be useful? It
On Monday 12 February 2007 21:28, Alex Cheng wrote:
I am programming on zope2.9, and it is a bit large project which contains
This is the wrong mailing list. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
Hello Alek,
'can't pickle Checker objects' happened to me, when I tried to write a
security proxied object to the ZODB.
Monday, February 12, 2007, 4:49:01 PM, you wrote:
AK Hello,
AK I finally managed to access local components from zope.scheduler, but I
felt to
AK another, even worse
The early bird registration deadline for Camp 5 and the BBQ Sprint is
Wednesday, February 14:
http://trizpug.org/boot-camp/camp5/
You can save $50 by registering early. Registration ends Friday March 2.
--
Sincerely,
Chris Calloway
http://www.seacoos.org
office: 332 Chapman Hall phone:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 12 February 2007 15:56, David Johnson wrote:
Many people have offered approaches. I find the simplest and
cleanest approach for declaring interfaces is as follows:
The cleanest way, in my opinion, is just not to use the addform directive
altogether.
Adam Groszer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Alek,
'can't pickle Checker objects' happened to me, when I tried to write a
security proxied object to the ZODB.
Monday, February 12, 2007, 4:49:01 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
The problem disappeared when I removed permission declaration from
I thought zope.formlib was more complex. As I understand you must
create custom browser classes, and page templates. Then you must
register those with a page or view ZCML browser directive, each of
which is more complicated than the addform.
My point is that if there is something new
Hi,
Zope 3.3.0
I hope everyone is well today.
If I have a container how do I find out what types of objects
it contains and then from that, how do I find out the schema
of the contained object?
Eg. I have a SQLAlchemyContainer with a SQLAlchemyContainerView.
The container contains the
12 matches
Mail list logo
