Re: [Zope3-Users] Building an admin interface

2007-07-17 Thread Hermann Himmelbauer
Am Montag, 16. Juli 2007 22:44 schrieb Stephan Richter: On Monday 16 July 2007 15:58, Benji York wrote: This reminds me of something I've been curious about but haven't had time to research lately.  What are the differences between pagelets and viewlets and their various

Re: [Zope3-Users] Zope3 PID file ?

2007-07-17 Thread Adam Groszer
Hello Thierry, What about zopectl logreopen? Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:17:50 AM, you wrote: TF Hi, TF I need to write scripts to handle Zope3 logfiles rotation. TF But I can't find any PID file for the running instance. TF Do I have to call for Zope restart or is there any other way which

Re: [Zope3-Users] Building an admin interface

2007-07-17 Thread Darryl Cousins
Hi, On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 08:45 +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: Am Montag, 16. Juli 2007 22:44 schrieb Stephan Richter: On Monday 16 July 2007 15:58, Benji York wrote: This reminds me of something I've been curious about but haven't had time to research lately. What are the

Re: [Zope3-Users] Zope3 PID file ?

2007-07-17 Thread Thierry Florac
Tuesday, July 17, 2007, 11:17:50 AM, you wrote: TF Hi, TF I need to write scripts to handle Zope3 logfiles rotation. TF But I can't find any PID file for the running instance. TF Do I have to call for Zope restart or is there any other way which could TF avoid restarting Zope and

Re: [Zope3-Users] Difference between schema fields default and missing_value

2007-07-17 Thread Darryl Cousins
Hi, On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 00:42 -0300, Luciano Ramalho wrote: I have not figured out the difference between these schema field attributes: - default: The default value if none was provided. - missing_value: In the case of missing input value, the value provided here is used. The quoted

AW: [Zope3-Users] Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Roger Ineichen
Hi Daniel -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Daniel Nouri Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007 01:32 An: zope3-users@zope.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [Zope3-Users] Re: AW: View or content provider Roger Ineichen wrote:

Re: [Zope3-Users] Building an admin interface

2007-07-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 02:45, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: That leads me to the question if it's possible to mix pagelets/viewlets? In my case, I have one main content area but I have some dynamic code, e.g. a navigation box, a login box, later perhaps a search box etc. How would I implement

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Monday 16 July 2007 19:32, Daniel Nouri wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. How would it show up in Google?  Google bots don't try

Re: [Zope3-Users] Zope3 PID file ?

2007-07-17 Thread Thierry Florac
Le mardi 17 juillet 2007 à 12:23 +0200, Martijn Pieters a écrit : On 7/17/07, Thierry Florac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about zopectl logreopen? zopectl logreopen works, but it seems that a SIGUSR2 signal is sent and that the whole Zope process is respawned. So I don't see any

[Zope3-Users] z3c.zalchemy / z3c.sqlalchemy

2007-07-17 Thread Thierry Florac
Hi, I'm looking for packages to ease integration of SQLAlchemy and Zope3. I found the two references listed into this message's subject and was wondering if there was any link between then, if both of them are up-to-date and actively maintained, and what where the benefits of using any or both

Re: [Zope3-Users] z3c.zalchemy / z3c.sqlalchemy

2007-07-17 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 17. Juli 2007 14:43:27 +0200 Thierry Florac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for packages to ease integration of SQLAlchemy and Zope3. I found the two references listed into this message's subject and was wondering if there was any link between then, if both of them are

[Zope3-Users] Re: AW: Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi! Roger Ineichen wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. How would it show up in Google? Google bots don't try arbitrary URLs, they

[Zope3-Users] Re: AW: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi! Stephan Richter wrote: On Monday 16 July 2007 19:32, Daniel Nouri wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will probably show up in google. How would it show up in Google?

Re: [Zope3-Users] ldappas+ldapadapter

2007-07-17 Thread Sergey Alembekov
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:19:51 +0400 Sergey Alembekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, everyone! I'm trying to use ldap based authentification. I successfully installed and tested ldapadapter, also i installed ldappas. But when i'm trying to Add LDAP Authentication Plugin in PAU, there is

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 17 July 2007 09:42, Daniel Nouri wrote: How exactly is it easier to secure a viewlet over securing a view? The fact that they're traversable doesn't mean that they have to be visible for everyone, does it? Am I missing something here? Content providers

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: Am Dienstag, 17. Juli 2007 14:08 schrieb Stephan Richter: On Monday 16 July 2007 19:32, Daniel Nouri wrote: I do not recommend using views for content that is only used inside a template. Because context/@@viewname is also traversable as a real view and will

Re: [Zope3-Users] z3c.zalchemy / z3c.sqlalchemy

2007-07-17 Thread Christian Theune
Am Dienstag, den 17.07.2007, 14:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Jung: --On 17. Juli 2007 14:43:27 +0200 Thierry Florac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for packages to ease integration of SQLAlchemy and Zope3. I found the two references listed into this message's subject and

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:18, Daniel Nouri wrote: Content providers and viewlets are not publically traversable. Being traversable does not make them insecure but it offers one more point of access and a potential security hole if not reviewed correctly. Do you test the security for all

[Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Daniel Nouri
Hi Roger! Roger Ineichen wrote: If you like a explicit pattern, then calling views in ZPT is fine. On the other hand, if you use a viewlet manager, the manager can implement conditions and show based on rules e.g. session state or login status more or less viewlets. I think best reason to

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: View or content provider

2007-07-17 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:28, Daniel Nouri wrote: plone.portlets introduces some two dozen (!) interfaces/concepts on top of viewlets in order to implement the flexibility that it needs.  E.g. it introduces an 'available' method/property that controls visibility, which viewlets by themselves

[Zope3-Users] Zope 3 API documentation needs a new strategy

2007-07-17 Thread Luciano Ramalho
One of the first questions anyone needs answered when studying a new framework is Where is the canonical reference for the API?. If you google for zope 3 api documentation the first link is Stephan Richter's mail of Jan/2004 announcing API doc. In it, there is the link: