Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 20 June 2007 13:55, Daniel Nouri wrote: >> Isn't it reasonable to expect an action to >> execute although it's not visible when the form is rendered again? > > Nope. For me the condition is a condition of availability and not visibility.
That's exactly where I feel it's behaving counter-intuitively: I expect that if my form has a button (action) in this page, that it's still "available" for the next request. Because the user is reacting on what he saw, not what he will see. Would it do much harm if the actions were available for execution always and only their visibility was controlled by the condition? I don't like how formlib apparently ignores a request for performing an action that's not available (but present). Wouldn't it be better to raise an error in this case? I imagine it's never useful to just ignore an action that's been requested. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3-users@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
