Brian Sullivan wrote at 2005-10-7 11:42 -0400:
I am looking for a simple strategy to write a debug log file from a python
script.
In an External Method (trusted code), you can write files
as usual in Python. An elementary log function could be:
def log(msg):
open(LOGFILE, a).write(msg)
Joshua Burvill wrote at 2005-10-7 12:28 +1000:
...
Currently there is a three step process:
1. install correct version of zope
2. unzip a zip file which I maintain that contains all the added libraries,
products, .zexp file, and external methods into their correct paths in the
zope root folder
Chris wrote at 2005-10-4 17:00 +0200:
...
If I call a DTML-Method from an other Method (e.g. dtml-var someDTML),
HTML entities are not converted.
This calls (renders) the DTML object
However if I call it from python (e.g. dtml-var somePath.someDTML
the entities are html_quoted.
this does
Vladimir Petrovic wrote at 2005-10-6 17:44 +0300:
... restricting Web Publishing in specific folders ...
I know this can be done by restricting View/Access Contents information
privileges for folders/scripts to the specific role and then giving DTML
methods proxy role. But, is there any other
So I have been reading and learning a lot the last couple days about
this whole AJAX thing. I really think it is something I am going
to move towards for web apps. However, I don't want to lose Zope.
I wonder if any of you would be willing to comment on this?
I quickly tested Ruby on Rails, given
Oh, that's cool! The naming RPC threw me off. I knew that
was there, but I guess my assumptions (I know , bad) were that it
communicated over a different protocol, not using port 80. But, I
suppose, tcp over port 80, spewing out xml is good. Probably just
what I need. I'll look into that and get a
Greg Fischer wrote:
Oh, that's cool! The naming RPC threw me off. I knew that was there,
but I guess my assumptions (I know , bad) were that it communicated over
a different protocol, not using port 80. But, I suppose, tcp over port
80, spewing out xml is good. Probably just what I need.
Sorry for the long message, but there's a lot of context. I've tried
to factor the problem out and then provide supporting stuff for the
interested. Zope 2.7.6, Python 2.4.1 (Python 2.3.5 behaves in the same
fashion).
In summary, the problem is that a query run as a test from the ZMI of
the
2005/10/8, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Oct 8, 2005, at 6:54 AM, Greg Fischer wrote:
I would love to have a product (called ZAjax :) that simply
receives a request from the client and spits out xml. To be more
specific, a set of classes that call ZSQL methods and retrieve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Allison wrote:
Sorry for the long message, but there's a lot of context. I've tried
to factor the problem out and then provide supporting stuff for the
interested. Zope 2.7.6, Python 2.4.1 (Python 2.3.5 behaves in the same
fashion).
Right. And that is the problem.
I patched lib/python/Shared/DC/ZRDB/dtml/customDefaultReport.dtml per your
suggestion and it fixed the bug I'd reported earlier which had to do with
proper termination of the ranges. Those now work.
Now, there is a second bug. When the query is dynamic,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Oct 7 11:01:02 2005 UTC to Sat Oct 8 11:01:02 2005 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Fri Oct 7 22:22:18 EDT
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me
how to fix the parser (*.mar files anyone?).
Stefan
[snip]
File /usr/local/Zope-2_8-branch/lib/python/Products/ZGadflyDA/
gadfly/kjParser.py, line
--On 8. Oktober 2005 15:41:57 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me how
to fix the parser (*.mar files anyone?).
No idea about the specific
--On 8. Oktober 2005 16:04:46 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--On 8. Oktober 2005 15:41:57 +0200 Stefan H. Holek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This change breaks Gadfly which doesn't seem to like 'null' at all. I
poked around in ZGadflyDA/gadfly a bit, but it's not obvious to me
Hi All,
During complication, the XML parser that processes non-HTML mode ZPT's
decodes the string of the source into unicode instructions.
In HTML mode, the parse does no decoding and so we get string instructions.
My question as a result is: what characterset does the XML parser in
Hi All,
I'd like to backport the change I made to fix:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1490
...to the 2.8 branch, would anyone have any objections to this?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
During complication, the XML parser that processes non-HTML mode ZPT's
^
+- compilation, I'm guessing, but see below ;)
decodes the string of the source into unicode instructions.
In HTML mode, the parse
--On 8. Oktober 2005 19:15:57 +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to backport the change I made to fix:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1490
...to the 2.8 branch, would anyone have any objections to this?
The 2.8 branch is closed for new features. With the
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'd like to backport the change I made to fix:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1490
...to the 2.8 branch, would anyone have any objections to this?
The 2.8 branch is closed for new features. With the time-based schedule
new features should appear regularly with new
Andreas Jung wrote:
The 2.8 branch is closed for new features. With the time-based schedule
new features should appear regularly with new major releases. So only
bug fixes should go into minor releases.
In fact, just noticing other mails, I'd also like to merge this to the
2.7 branch, I
Am Samstag, den 08.10.2005, 19:15 +0100 schrieb Chris Withers:
Hi All,
I'd like to backport the change I made to fix:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1490
...to the 2.8 branch, would anyone have any objections to this?
Surely not, but what fix? :-)
Nice to see some movement on this
--On 8. Oktober 2005 20:10:21 +0100 Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
I'd like to backport the change I made to fix:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1490
...to the 2.8 branch, would anyone have any objections to this?
The 2.8 branch is closed for new
Andreas Jung wrote:
Well, this is arguably a bug fix and I incorrectly filed it as a new
feature on the trunk.
If you can justify it as a bugfix before god and the world,go ahead :-)
Cool, will do so to the 2.7 and 2.8 branches tomorrow :-)
cheers,
Chris
PS: I'll mark it as a bug fix in
24 matches
Mail list logo
