Re: [Zope] Re: zope 2.8.4 on windows 98

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 12. November 2005 16:53:43 -0800 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:52:28 -0800, Fernando Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand the problem, but is it the intention that zope is not supported on win98? Yes, I believe this is intentional. Windows 98

[Zope] Re: zope 2.8.4 on windows 98

2005-11-13 Thread Fernando Martins
Andreas Jung wrote: On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:52:28 -0800, Fernando Martins fernando at cmartins.demon.nl wrote: I understand the problem, but is it the intention that zope is not supported on win98? Yes, I believe this is intentional. Windows 98 is a seven year old OS with insufficient

Re: [Zope] Re: zope 2.8.4 on windows 98

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 13. November 2005 09:26:18 +0100 Fernando Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm confused by your statement: if zope 2.8.4 is calling an NT security function, not available in win98, then it does NOT run on win98?? DO you mean there is something wrong with my win98 setup or that

[Zope] session variables in the presence of conflicts

2005-11-13 Thread Dennis Allison
Zope 2.8.4 ZEO 3.4.2 ZODB 3.4.2 Python 2.4.2 or 2.3.5 MySQL 4.0.20 MySQL-Python 1.2.0 MYSQLDA 2.0.9 We have just moved from Zope 2.7.6 to Zope 2.8.4 motivated, in part, but the ability to avoid read conflicts under ZODB 3.4.2. We have been having a lot of problems: more conflict errors,

Re: [Zope] Sessions and Persistence

2005-11-13 Thread Peter Bengtsson
Dennis, can you try the same thing but without recreating SESSION as a variable of REQUEST, i.e. like this instead:: # Script (Python) setSessionVariable ##bind container=container ##bind context=context ##bind namespace= ##bind script=script ##bind subpath=traverse_subpath ##parameters=var, val

Re: [Zope] session variables in the presence of conflicts

2005-11-13 Thread Peter Bengtsson
Have you considered upgrading to PostgreSQL? Things might have changed since the last time I tried mysql but I'm pretty sure Postgresql and psycopg deals much better with transactions in Zope. Admittedly, this doesn't explain why you're getting into trouble just because you've upgraded to zodb

[Zope] Zope-Documentation: Args

2005-11-13 Thread Horst Jäger
Hi, I've found quite a lot of doc about the Zope built-in-functions. But very often I miss information about the args that can be passed to the functions, e.g. manage_changeProperties. You find a description of the function, an example passing REQUEST, but I had to guess that you can pass a

Re: [Zope] Zope-Documentation: Args

2005-11-13 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Am Sonntag, den 13.11.2005, 14:15 +0100 schrieb Horst Jäger: Hi, I've found quite a lot of doc about the Zope built-in-functions. But very often I miss information about the args that can be passed to the functions, e.g. manage_changeProperties. You find a description of the function, an

[Zope] Re: Zope-Documentation: Args

2005-11-13 Thread Florent Guillaume
Tino Wildenhain wrote: I've found quite a lot of doc about the Zope built-in-functions. But very often I miss information about the args that can be passed to the functions, e.g. manage_changeProperties. You find a description of the function, an example passing REQUEST, but I had to guess

Re: [Zope] Re: Zope-Documentation: Args

2005-11-13 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Am Sonntag, den 13.11.2005, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Florent Guillaume: Tino Wildenhain wrote: I've found quite a lot of doc about the Zope built-in-functions. But very often I miss information about the args that can be passed to the functions, e.g. manage_changeProperties. You find a

Re: [Zope] Re: Zope-Documentation: Args

2005-11-13 Thread Florent Guillaume
On 13 Nov 2005, at 16:31, Tino Wildenhain wrote: Well, except that in this case the docstring for manage_changeProperties is badly wrong, if you pass a mapping as first argument, it will think it's a request and render a page you'll never use as a result, which slows it down a lot. The

[Zope] Non-responsive objects reprise

2005-11-13 Thread Garth B.
Hello everyone, this is from an older thread which I'm resurrecting with more information. Despite Dieter's helpful pointers I'm no closer to solving this problem but do have more information about it in case anyone can lend a hand. To quickly recap: Periodically when visiting our zope site,

[Zope] Problem with permissions in 2.8.4

2005-11-13 Thread Pablo Ziliani
Hello, I am having a very tough time with permissions after I have upgraded to 2.8.4 from 2.8.1, and I would really appreciate some help as I have exhausted my imagination trying to figure what's wrong. I have the following structure in my zope instance: zope root | sites ||

[Zope] Re: Non-responsive objects reprise

2005-11-13 Thread Florent Guillaume
You probably have a network problem, all the Zope logs show everything was completed normally (your points 1 and 3). Your problem may be tied to packet size or keepalives. A network trace, for instance using Ethereal, will probably help you more than anything. Florent Garth B. wrote: Hello

[Zope] Re: Problem with permissions in 2.8.4 (resolved)

2005-11-13 Thread Pablo Ziliani
Replying to my own post as I just found the answer to my problem (which had nothing to do with the version of zope). The problem was that when I mass-imported some folders to the new instance, I didn't check to retain the ownership information; thus the templates where executed whith the

Re: [Zope] session variables in the presence of conflicts

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 01:39 -0800, Dennis Allison wrote: Zope 2.8.4 ZEO 3.4.2 ZODB 3.4.2 Python 2.4.2 or 2.3.5 MySQL 4.0.20 MySQL-Python 1.2.0 MYSQLDA 2.0.9 We have just moved from Zope 2.7.6 to Zope 2.8.4 motivated, in part, but the ability to avoid read conflicts under ZODB 3.4.2.

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/slinkp-collector_596/ Cleaned up an old branch.

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Winkler
Log message for revision 40067: Cleaned up an old branch. Changed: D Zope/branches/slinkp-collector_596/ -=- ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/slinkp_1726_zopeundo/ Cleaned out old branch.

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Winkler
Log message for revision 40069: Cleaned out old branch. Changed: D Zope/branches/slinkp_1726_zopeundo/ -=- ___ Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/slinkp-configure_changes/configure - No longer try to execute directories.

2005-11-13 Thread Paul Winkler
Log message for revision 40075: - No longer try to execute directories. Changed: U Zope/branches/slinkp-configure_changes/configure -=- Modified: Zope/branches/slinkp-configure_changes/configure === ---

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/test.py Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path.

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
Log message for revision 40091: Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path. Changed: U Zope/trunk/test.py -=- Modified: Zope/trunk/test.py === --- Zope/trunk/test.py 2005-11-14 04:25:55 UTC (rev 40090) +++ Zope/trunk/test.py

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/test.py Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path (redux).

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
Log message for revision 40092: Don't hard-wire forward-slash into sys.path (redux). Changed: U Zope/trunk/test.py -=- Modified: Zope/trunk/test.py === --- Zope/trunk/test.py 2005-11-14 04:47:30 UTC (rev 40091) +++

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December Zope releases on November 1. OK. I thought there was going to be a 2.9 branch by now, but I don't see one. Is the trunk totally frozen

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris McDonough wrote: I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually supposed to make the branch. I have just gone ahead and made it. But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features. I wish you hadn't done that. We shouldn't be making the branch

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Stephan Richter
On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it. But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features. I wish

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually supposed to make the branch. I have just gone ahead and made it. But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 13. November 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I appreciate that you were trying to help. I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :) svn delete should solve that problem :-) -aj pgpwMOGS2dLXV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually supposed to make the branch. I have just gone ahead and made it.

[Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-13 Thread Florent Guillaume
Andreas Jung wrote: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/collector_contents?searching=yepSear chableText=status%3Alist%3Aignore_empty=Acceptedstatus%3Alist%3Aignore_ empty=Pendingclassifications%3Alist%3Aignore_empty=bugimportances%3Alis t%3Aignore_empty=critical Ups, I got your point. I

[Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 13. November 2005 20:33:01 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyway if we want to go further we need to schedule bug days. One per week, or something like that. Otherwise nobody will set aside the time to discuss, investigate and fix the current bugs. Right, right, but

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: --On 13. November 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris, I appreciate that you were trying to help. I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :) svn delete should solve that problem :-) Of course the

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 13. November 2005 14:55:22 -0500 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'd like to understand the rationale for not branching at the time if the feature freeze (Nov 1). Is it just to avoid the work of merging changes from the branch back the HEAD during the period between the

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:07 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: Branches aka new features should be merged into the HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state and to be able to cut a release branch at any time. Yup.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-13 Thread Craeg Strong
What about making the banch but calling it an alpha release? I suspect many more people would have a chance to kick the tires if they could download binaries. You may find some of the critical bugs actually only occur in very specific circumstances, or that there are other, even more critical

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 12:38 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote: Chris McDonough wrote: I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 15:20 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:07 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: Branches aka new features should be merged into the HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:55 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: ... Also, it sounds as if there's an argument being made that *everyone* should pitch in to get 2.9 beta out the door *instead* of committing Zope 2 feature work and the delayed

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not. But there needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness. To create the branch or a beta release? I realize there's a desire to tie these acts together but still don't

Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:07 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote: On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not. But there needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness. To create the branch or a beta release? I realize

[Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December Zope releases on November 1. OK. I thought there was going to be a

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tim Peters
[Tres Seaver] ... Which bugs? Sombebody needs to define this, or else risk having the outsiders just walk away. Insiders too ;-) *I* know of no showstoppers: all unit tests are passing, Not on Windows: Windows test failures on Zope trunk http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Peters wrote: [Tres Seaver] ... Which bugs? Sombebody needs to define this, or else risk having the outsiders just walk away. Insiders too ;-) *I* know of no showstoppers: all unit tests are passing, Not on Windows:

[Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 19:05 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: Paul Winkler wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December Zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 19:20 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: ... Note that of all the recent changes, I would jettison zpkg-based builds *first* if our timebox is at risk; I certainly wouldn't agree with leaving the trunk frozen due to issues with a *very* recently-proposed change which provides no

[Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-13 Thread Florent Guillaume
[Reply-To and Followup-To zope-dev] Andreas Jung wrote: Anyway if we want to go further we need to schedule bug days. One per week, or something like that. Otherwise nobody will set aside the time to discuss, investigate and fix the current bugs. Right, right, but there must be enough people

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
FWIW, a patched setup.py that appears to compile all known Z2 and Z3 extensions successfully (at least it completes and Zope starts) which doesn't use any zpkg extensions is available at http://www.plope.com/static/misc/setup.py . I took this from the old setup.py before Phil checked in his zpkg

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] Windows test failures on Zope trunk http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931 [Tres] Without Windows-centric developers who are motivated to investigate and fix those bugs, I don't know what else we can do. [Mark Hammond] That bugs points at

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 13. November 2005 19:05:44 -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which bugs? Sombebody needs to define this, or else risk having the outsiders just walk away. *I* know of no showstoppers: all unit tests are passing, CMF-trunk runs fine on the Zope trunk, etc. About one week

[Zope-dev] Re: branched Zope 2.9

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 14. November 2005 02:42:31 +0100 Florent Guillaume [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Reply-To and Followup-To zope-dev] Andreas Jung wrote: Anyway if we want to go further we need to schedule bug days. One per week, or something like that. Otherwise nobody will set aside the time to discuss,

[Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Hammond wrote: Not on Windows: Windows test failures on Zope trunk http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931 CMF-trunk runs fine on the Zope trunk, etc. Certainly agree it would help to have a specific list of what (if anything)

[Zope-dev] Re: Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: Mark Hammond wrote: Not on Windows: Windows test failures on Zope trunk http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1931 CMF-trunk runs fine on the Zope trunk, etc. Certainly agree it would help to have a specific list of

Re: [Zope-DB] related to Plone+Zope+MySQL

2005-11-13 Thread -bhavana -
hi, i mean to say i create one protlet and search to my MySQL database but the result is shown in non Plone page. how to i display my result in body of Plone? please help. thankx in advance. bh On 11/11/05, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --On 11. November 2005 14:27:49 +0700 -bhavana -