I have tried many varieties, but I can't remember ever getting it to work...
A few googles shows me nothing either.
Any quick hints?
Gaute
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML
On Friday 02 March 2007 11:20, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. März 2007 11:10:57 +0100 Gaute Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried many varieties, but I can't remember ever getting it to
work...
A few googles shows me nothing either.
returning a macro?
-aj
Something like this:
What do you want to do with your macro?
2007/3/2, Gaute Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 02 March 2007 11:20, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. März 2007 11:10:57 +0100 Gaute Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried many varieties, but I can't remember ever getting it to
work...
Gaute Amundsen schrieb:
foo = restrictedTraverse('/foo/bar/index.html/macros/mymacro')
You can use this macro in a template.
div metal:use-macro=foo/
Tonico
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No
I never thank I can do that with a macro. I always use the standard way,
like Tonico wrote. I learnt something :)
2007/3/2, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gaute Amundsen wrote:
On Friday 02 March 2007 11:20, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 2. März 2007
I seem to recall hearing in the past that unpickling in general was
insecure for some reason.
I'd like to allow less-priveleged users to upload their ZEXP files on
their own and import them into their own Folders.
Are there any security issues with ZEXP import?
Thanks,
-jordan.
[EMAIL
On 3/2/07, Jordan Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I seem to recall hearing in the past that unpickling in general was
insecure for some reason.
I'd like to allow less-priveleged users to upload their ZEXP files on
their own and import them into their own Folders.
Are there any security issues
Hi,
Undoer is a product/patch that enables transactions to be undone based
on a date. Useful if you or someone else has managed to make a lot of
separate changes that would be cumbersome to undo the usual Zope way and
no recent (enough) backups are available. See the Undo tab in the Zope
Gary Poster wrote:
Okay, so I want a persistent, ordered sequence which is quick to find
items in and which doesn't re-store the whole sequence when an item is
inserted or removed.
What should I be using?
Ordered, as in sorted? Or ordered, as in user-determined order?
Ordered as in
On Mar 1, 2:50 am, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the DZUG is working on a read-only mirror that will be accessible via
anonymous HTTP.
It will likely be available shortly after the upcoming Subversion
ugprade.
Great news.
One question: you mention the upcoming subversion
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
On Mar 1, 2:50 am, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the DZUG is working on a read-only mirror that will be accessible via
anonymous HTTP.
It will likely be available shortly after the upcoming Subversion
ugprade.
Great news.
One
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Mar 1 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Mar 2 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 7 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.6 Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Mar 1 21:07:07 EST 2007
On Mar 2, 2007, at 2:42 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Okay, so I want a persistent, ordered sequence which is quick to
find items in and which doesn't re-store the whole sequence when
an item is inserted or removed.
What should I be using?
Ordered, as in sorted? Or
13 matches
Mail list logo
