[Zope] Zope Collector #2346

2007-09-01 Thread blists
Hello, 2 weeks ago I reported the following Bug: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2346 in which I describe a server crash when using the FastCGI server under Zope 2.9.x, x = 5. I'm a little bit surprised that the bug severity was downgraded to medium since, short of DB-corruption, I cannot

Re: [Zope] Zope Collector #2346

2007-09-01 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 1. September 2007 11:01:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, 2 weeks ago I reported the following Bug: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2346 in which I describe a server crash when using the FastCGI server under Zope 2.9.x, x = 5. I'm a little bit surprised that the bug severity

Re: [Zope] Zope Collector #2346

2007-09-01 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 1. September 2007 11:01:40 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, 2 weeks ago I reported the following Bug: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2346 in which I describe a server crash when using the FastCGI server under Zope 2.9.x, x = 5. I'm a little bit surprised that the bug severity

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/Products/ It turns out we'll still have to wrap content providers because there might

2007-09-01 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Log message for revision 79429: It turns out we'll still have to wrap content providers because there might be legacy implementations out there needing it. Therefore we need to keep our own ProviderExpression implementation. Added legacy tests for content providers and viewlets

[Zope-Checkins] SVN: Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/ We do need to do some wrapping when objects are found via namespace

2007-09-01 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Log message for revision 79432: We do need to do some wrapping when objects are found via namespace traversal. Changed: U Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/OFS/Traversable.py U Zope/branches/philikon-aq/lib/python/Products/Five/browser/tests/aqlegacy.py U

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Options replacing DateTime with datetime!?

2007-09-01 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 28. August 2007 12:04:35 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: snip / I believe that datetime is not even importable in TTW code and datetime objects not accessible in TTW code -- at least, they have not been until recently...

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-09-01 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Aug 31 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Sat Sep 1 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Fri Aug 31 20:53:05 EDT 2007

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Options replacing DateTime with datetime!?

2007-09-01 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-9-1 12:59 +0200: ... I came across python-dateutil some days ago http://labix.org/python-dateutil which appears really impressive to me (and useful). python-dateutil + datetime would be an equivalent replacement for DateTime. Just for the logs: I gave up my work on

[Zope-DB] passing multiple variables via the url string

2007-09-01 Thread onsombal
I'm attempting to pass multiple variables via the url string. field1 field2 are form variables to be passed on a redirect. field1 = 'foo' field2 = 'bar' For the command below, I do not get a python syntax error unless I remove the + symbols: return