Garito wrote:
Could someone point me where the page template code decide if an
expression is a path expression or a string or python one, please?
I'm studying the zope page template classes and I would like to
understand where this decision is taken
Hi,
(I'm new to Zope and Plone, so don't hesitate to indicate me a more appropriate
mailing-list if necessary)
I am curently looking for a library (idealy, ready-for-Plone3.x-Zope2.10)
allowing the creation and management of a thesaurus. Our requirements are the
following:
- creation of our own
On Aug 11, 2008, at 14:26 , Benjamin Michiels wrote:
Hi,
(I'm new to Zope and Plone, so don't hesitate to indicate me a more
appropriate
mailing-list if necessary)
You may get better Plone-related answers on the Plone list(s). See
plone.org.
jens
I am wondering about is the nature of the problems with ZClasses that
led to their deprecation. If I move a 2.5.1 installation to 2.11, are
my several existing ZClass-based products going to break in any known
way I should be aware of? Should I consider a last-known-good upgrade
target instead?
Hi Philipp!
Thank you so much for your response but in this lines is were the engine
loads the possibilities but not were evaluate the current expression
I would like to evaluate some condition before to load the class who
resolves the expression (and witch is loaded in the code you point me)
--On 11. August 2008 08:44:21 -0500 Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering about is the nature of the problems with ZClasses that
led to their deprecation. If I move a 2.5.1 installation to 2.11, are
my several existing ZClass-based products going to break in
For the spanish website try google translate
I wonder how difficult is for a english person to read something isn't in
his/her language
If non english do the same...
2008/8/11 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 11, 2008, at 14:26 , Benjamin Michiels wrote:
Hi,
(I'm new to Zope
--On 11. August 2008 15:48:21 +0200 Garito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Philipp!
Thank you so much for your response but in this lines is were the engine
loads the possibilities but not were evaluate the current expression
I would like to evaluate some condition before to load the class who
Use:
/path/to/the/object/with/${some/magic/variables}/to/solve/some/paths/in/a/simplest/way
You could do that converting the path above to
python: path(path('string:' +
'/path/to/the/object/with/${some/magic/variables}/to/solve/some/paths/in/a/simplest/way'))
or in a generic way:
python:
Garito wrote:
Use:
/path/to/the/object/with/${some/magic/variables}/to/solve/some/paths/in/a/simplest/way
Path expressions already support this.
tal:define=pathel some/magic/variables;
objpath/to/the/object/with/?pathel/to/solve/some/...
So basically in TALES path
Considere this case:
I have the sking value in the variable at args/Yanged/Skin
How can I do the equivalent to
args/Yanged/raiz/Skins/${args/Yanged/Skin}/arbolYanged.css/absolute_url
?
In the python way it will be:
path(path('string:' +
Finally it's possible to do what I need without the need to declare any
variable?
If not my change will be 4-6 lines of code and it's ok for me to make this
change
I only need to understand were the code decides if the expression is
standard, string or python
Could you help me?
Thanks!
Garito wrote:
Considere this case:
I have the sking value in the variable at args/Yanged/Skin
How can I do the equivalent to
args/Yanged/raiz/Skins/${args/Yanged/Skin}/arbolYanged.css/absolute_url
?
In the python way it will be:
path(path('string:' +
Yes, it's ok but I can save n variable definitions with 4 lines of code in 1
point
Seems quite interesting for me
Could someone point me were the page template decides if the expression is a
standard, string, python, etc one, please? ;)
2008/8/11 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garito wrote:
Finally it's possible to do what I need without the need to declare any
variable?
Not that I know of.
If not my change will be 4-6 lines of code and it's ok for me to make
this change
I only need to understand were the code decides if the expression is
standard, string
Sure Philipp! I'm searching for some days and I still searching but if
someone else knows the point perhaps he/she accelerate me ;)
Thank you so much for your interest, Philipp!
2008/8/11 Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garito wrote:
Finally it's possible to do what I need
Hi,
a) the wiki is down. Can someone please fix this?
b) the homepage of zope.interface 3.0.0b1 points to the wiki. I changed
this so that c) gets fixed for now.
This probably results in 3.0.0b1 becoming uninstallable right now,
although I doubt that it was installable (through the wiki)
On Aug 11, 2008, at 10:07 , Christian Theune wrote:
a) the wiki is down. Can someone please fix this?
Well, it wasn't down like it always was on the old server, Apache just
served an empty page for it. This appears to have been a (unrelated)
Apache configuration. It's fixed now.
jens
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds up
the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but this damages the usefulness
of README.txt as documentation.
As someone who's never used zope3recipes, I'm going to read
Aaron Lehmann wrote:
If the buildout is nailed to that version or above, and there is none,
it breaks.
Well, breaks is good, but hopefully that means gives an error message
along the lines of '''you specified version 'x.y.z' which could not be
found'''. Is that what happens or do you just
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Aug 10 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Aug 11 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Aug 10 20:52:30 EDT 2008
URL:
On Monday 11 August 2008, Christian Theune wrote:
c) buildout/setuptools crashes on the opportunity that urllib raises a
BadStatusLine exception instead of checking the next possibility. This
is inside of setuptools though.
Thanks for debugging. :-) That was my first task this morning. ;-)
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds
up the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but this damages the
usefulness of README.txt as documentation.
As
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 11, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is this change ok?
It seems to solve the previous failures in the 3.4 kgs, and speeds
up the test.
I don't have a problem with the change, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Behrens Matt - Grand Rapids wrote:
I've been playing with making an extraction/authentication plugin that
takes a cryptographically signed cookie (shared secret and a SHA hash,
for the curious) from an external script, with username and expiry
25 matches
Mail list logo
