Re: [Zope] repairing zodb in 2.10.5

2008-11-19 Thread Dieter Maurer
baiewola wrote at 2008-11-18 13:48 -0800: I'm running zope 2.10.5 on Macintosh OS X Leopard Server and I see that several objects seem to be corrupted, as evidenced by poskey errors and the fact that I can no longer access or delete them. I have found web sites suggesting that I use fsrecover.py,

Re: [Zope-dev] deprecate http://download.zope.org/distribution

2008-11-19 Thread Martijn Faassen
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Zagrodnick wrote: On 2008-11-12 23:41:55 +0100, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://download.zope.org/distribution was set up as a place to publish distributions while we were learning about setuptools, eggs,

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed

2008-11-19 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 18 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Nov 19 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Test failures - Subject: FAILED (failures=3) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.5 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Tue Nov 18 20:36:54 EST

Re: [Zope-dev] deprecate http://download.zope.org/distribution

2008-11-19 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: Christian Zagrodnick wrote: On 2008-11-12 23:41:55 +0100, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://download.zope.org/distribution was set up as a place to publish distributions while we were learning

Re: [Zope-dev] deprecate http://download.zope.org/distribution

2008-11-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Anybody who really needs such an egg should be competent to rebuild it from SVN (since the revision ID or tag is implied by the name), and should certainly be willing to host that egg in a private index / location for their project: in fact, they should take this

Re: [Zope-dev] deprecate http://download.zope.org/distribution

2008-11-19 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tres Seaver wrote: Anybody who really needs such an egg should be competent to rebuild it from SVN (since the revision ID or tag is implied by the name), and should certainly be willing to host that egg in a