I'm doing a hard task, trying to improve maximum of possible performance to
Zope/Plone server, I already installed CacheFu that improved so much
performance, I saw on a blog about cache for Python calls but wasn't
explained about your configuration or installation. there are any related
product
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Before starting with any kind of performance optimization:
figure out your bottlenecks first by profiling your code:
ZopeProfiler is your friend.
- -aj
On 17.04.2009 15:10 Uhr, iarly selbir | ski0s wrote:
I'm doing a hard task, trying to improve
This code isn't my, the server is hosting sites of many govern
departments, so my task isn't develop the code but is keep all system
working fine without down times.
I'm not allowed to change the code, so I'm looking for all other reachable
performance features.
Regards,
- -
iarly selbir |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Various knobs affect Zope performance...depending on each individual
site and their programming and needs..serious further hints require
a closer analysis.
- -aj
On 17.04.2009 15:27 Uhr, iarly selbir | ski0s wrote:
This code isn't my, the server is
No problem guy all test that I doing is on test environment xD, errors are
acceptable, all problems solution are stored in my personal knowledge base
heh
Btw I'm reading about memoize installation I don't saw anything related to
code changes
Look:
plone.memoize Installation
iarly selbir | ski0s schrieb:
I'm doing a hard task, trying to improve maximum of possible performance
to Zope/Plone server, I already installed CacheFu that improved so much
performance, I saw on a blog about cache for Python calls but wasn't
explained about your configuration or
Log message for revision 99247:
preparing 2.12.0a2
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
U Zope/trunk/inst/WinBuilders/mk/zope.mk
U Zope/trunk/inst/versions.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.rst
===
---
Log message for revision 99248:
added note on easy_install
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.rst
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.rst
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.rst 2009-04-17 14:16:32 UTC (rev 99247)
+++
Log message for revision 99250:
'creating tag
svn+ssh://andreasj...@svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/tags/2.12.0a2 from
svn+ssh://andreasj...@svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/trunk'
Changed:
A Zope/tags/2.12.0a2/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist -
Hey,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
I do realise that this derails Maritjn's focus slightly, but I don't
think we've lost the idea that there may be value in maintaining a
larger KGS.
The whole idea of whatever-Zope 3-is-designated-as just being a larger
KGS strikes me as strange. Frankly it
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
I do realise that this derails Maritjn's focus slightly, but I don't
think we've lost the idea that there may be value in maintaining a
larger KGS.
The whole idea of whatever-Zope 3-is-designated-as just being a larger
KGS
Hi All,
I tried to connect up to Zope 2.12 by the webdav source port today and
got the following in the event log::
2009-04-17 09:13:48 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog 1239956028.70.143658354715
http://192.168.1.12:1980/@@home
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in
Hey Martin,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
Sigh... this discussion is just really difficult. I don't really
understand what the problem is here, or why it's indicative of what's
wrong with this community, but then I'm pretty lost in concepts and
names at this stage.
I think you're reading
Hi
From: zope-dev-boun...@zope.org [mailto:zope-dev-boun...@zope.org] On Behalf
To be honest, zope3 (as it is today) is a nice platform for me and for my
company to build web applications (and, in general, the ZCA is a nice
platform for building not-only-web applications), and it would be a
Wow, long thread started just from an attempt to define the words we
were talking about. :)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:04, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll say again, though: Gary's version of the story (the Zope 3
community has become focused on supporting other app servers
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Apr 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Apr 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Thu Apr 16 20:48:10 EDT 2009
URL:
Hello there,
* 2009-04-16 09:44, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Just so we don't lose track of who are interested in maintaining Zope 3
(and/or the ZMI). I've distilled the following list of people who are
interested in helping maintain Zope 3. This might mean making sure
existing apps work,
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Hey,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
I put a mark in my calendar for October to reconsider the future of the
name Zope 3 then.
Given the responses to this thread I'm starting to lean towards pushing
the message to the outside that Zope 3 has become Zope Toolkit,
Rob Miller schrieb:
Gary Poster wrote:
This message seems like a reasonable start to me: Zope 3 has become
focused on supporting frameworks and applications, rather than trying
to be one itself. It is now called the Zope Toolkit. Parts of it are
used by Zope 2, Plone, Grok,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 14:47, Carsten Senger sen...@rehfisch.de wrote:
Pushing this message inside the zope community is perfect. But I don't
see a need to communicate to outsiders that Zope 3 has become the Zope
Toolkit. This will be confusing to outsiders. They don't have to think
about
Lennart Regebro schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 14:47, Carsten Senger sen...@rehfisch.de wrote:
Pushing this message inside the zope community is perfect. But I don't
see a need to communicate to outsiders that Zope 3 has become the Zope
Toolkit. This will be confusing to outsiders. They
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I tried to connect up to Zope 2.12 by the webdav source port today and
got the following in the event log::
2009-04-17 09:13:48 ERROR Zope.SiteErrorLog 1239956028.70.143658354715
http://192.168.1.12:1980/@@home
Tres Seaver wrote:
It means that you have *part* of the WebDAV machinery wired up (hence
the NullResource objects) but not all of it (hence, you are trying to
render a ZPT which uses /path/to/template/macros/main). Likely there is
a missing adapter registration or six in there.
I don't want
Hi,
I am working on the 2.12.0a2 release. I get test failures on my Linux box
(OpenSuse 10.3/64 bit,
fresh Python 2.6.2 installation):
--
File
In addition, some of the Acquistion test fail when trying to test the
package alone:
aj...@blackmoon:/develop/repository/svn.zope.org/Acquisition/tags/2.11.1
bin/test -vv
Running tests at level 1
Running zope.testing.testrunner.layer.UnitTests tests:
Set up
Hey,
Carsten Senger wrote:
[snip]
Btw: Somebody should change Zope Framework to Zope Toolkit on
zope.org and remove the version number v3.5 from the Zope Toolkit
documentation.
Could you fix the Zope Toolkit documentation and change it to 1.0? It's
in SVN.
It'd be very nice if you could
Andreas Jung wrote:
I am working on the 2.12.0a2 release. I get test failures on my Linux
box (OpenSuse 10.3/64 bit,
fresh Python 2.6.2 installation):
64bit problem maybe?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
Hey,
Lennart Regebro wrote:
A more truthful story is that Zope Toolkit is a base for writing
frameworks, and that one of those frameworks was Zope 3, now renamed
to something cool. But the support in this thread for the previous
story makes me wonder if we shouldn't push that, slightly more
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 16:51, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
We should just retain the Zope 3 name to the outside world for the time
being, but de-emphasize it in our communication. We push Zope Toolkit a
lot more. If people want to get started using the toolkit, we point them
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Simon Michael wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
I think what is clear or not is very subjective. I think that at least
is clear.
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Simon Michael wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
I think what is clear or not is very subjective. I think that at least
is clear.
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
censored by the PSU
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 17:07, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
But still not accurate. I've yet hear anybody actually support the
point of view that we should (internally or externally) push a story
that is not really true. If this indeed is the opinion of the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 18:00, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
What opinions have been disregarded, more exactly?
--
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
On Apr 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 18:00, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
What opinions have been disregarded, more exactly?
Gary's, Mine, Tres', Simon's, Benji's and others I
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Simon Michael wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
I think what is clear or not is very subjective. I think that at least
is clear.
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
Okay, I'll come
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Simon Michael wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
I think what is clear or not is very subjective. I think that at least
is clear.
I think it is clear
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 18:00, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I think it is clear that you are disregarding many people's opinions.
What opinions have been disregarded, more exactly?
Gary's, Mine, Tres', Simon's,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 18:25, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
Gary's, Mine, Tres', Simon's, Benji's and others I could find if I trolled
through the thread, which I won't.
I can't see how these have been disregarded. Gary proposed that we say
that Zope 3 has been renamed to the Zope Toolkit.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
It means that you have *part* of the WebDAV machinery wired up (hence
the NullResource objects) but not all of it (hence, you are trying to
render a ZPT which uses /path/to/template/macros/main). Likely
Hey Fabio,
Thanks again for coming back on this, this is quite encouraging.
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I've just checked out that the domain zope3.org is not owned by the Zope
Corporation. Do you have any idea about it? Would it be possible to claim
it back?
I don't know, unfortunately.
I'm
Lennart Regebro wrote:
So, if I'm gonna act hurt, I'll claim that anybodys opinion here is
being disregarded, it's mine. ;-)
And I'll state it again, for clarities sake:
I think that Zope 3 should be renamed. I proposed Blue Bream (and
...
I have still to see any arguments against this. If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On svn.zope.org we have a library called z3c.javascript. Never got
released to pypi, but it did get released to download.zope.org/distribution
It basically contains a pile of javascript libraries. These have
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 19:03, Simon Michael si...@joyful.com wrote:
Um.. people will laugh at us ?
No, *with* us. Big difference. :)
--
Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey Martin,
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[snip]
Sigh... this discussion is just really difficult. I don't really
understand what the problem is here, or why it's indicative of what's
wrong with this community, but then I'm pretty lost in concepts and
names at this stage.
Hey Rob,
Rob Miller wrote:
[snip]
sure, i understand what you're saying here. it'd be great if some set of
folks who are using the full Z3 app server platform decided to step up,
create
a website, refine the branding, and just generally breathe life into the
project. but, until someone
Tres Seaver wrote:
Why are *any* adapters I've wired up being used here?
(I haven't wired up anything for webdav, only normal views and the like
I want used for http)
I'm sorry if I seemed to imply a bug in your application: I meant to
point out that the *publisher* was finding the wrong
Hi All,
What I want to do is best shown in pseudocode:
something.setLanguage('fr')
text = my_page_template()
something.restoreLanguage()
...the reason I want to do this is that the results of that template
will not be in the language negotiated for the current user, as the
result is then
+1 with Tres' position.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Simon Michael wrote:
-1, Gary's is clearer.
Hi Tres
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.javascript license question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On svn.zope.org we have a library called z3c.javascript. Never got
released to pypi, but it did get released to
How about just monkeypatching the active negotiator?
{{{
negotiator = getUtility(zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator)
orig = negotiator.getLanguage
negotiator.getLanguage = lambda foo, bar: 'fr'
text = my_page_template()
negotiator.getLanguage = orig
}}}
Haven't tested it, but in my (limited)
Ethan Jucovy wrote:
How about just monkeypatching the active negotiator?
{{{
negotiator = getUtility(zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator)
orig = negotiator.getLanguage
negotiator.getLanguage = lambda foo, bar: 'fr'
text = my_page_template()
negotiator.getLanguage = orig
}}}
Haven't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] z3c.javascript license question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
On svn.zope.org we have a library called z3c.javascript. Never got
Actually -- for a more proper solution -- I believe
zope.i18n.interfaces.IUserPreferredLanguages is expected to adapt a request
(rather than being a contextless utility) so I bet you could register a
custom IUserPreferredLanguages whose getPreferredLanguages returns ['fr'] on
an IForceLanguage
Actually -- for a more proper solution -- I believe
zope.i18n.interfaces.IUserPreferredLanguages is expected to adapt a request
(rather than being a contextless utility) so I bet you could register a
custom IUserPreferredLanguages whose getPreferredLanguages returns ['fr'] on
an IForceLanguage
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I think I recall that Jim ripped out an integration package for the Ext
Javascript framework precisely because the licensing for Ext was
initially questionable, and later became outright unacceptable.
Yep, you recall
Hi!
2009/4/18 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
[super snip]
Now that the copyrights are transferred to the Zope Foundation,
essentially *nobody* can check in non-ZPL code, without a special
exemption from the ZF board or its delegate (nobody is yet appointed to
handle this).
I am looking
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[snip
Now that the copyrights are transferred to the Zope Foundation,
essentially *nobody* can check in non-ZPL code, without a special
exemption from the ZF board or its delegate (nobody is yet appointed to
handle
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Or attach a marker interface to the request and register a different
IUserPreferredLanguages adapter for it.
This won't quite work as I still need to get the language I'm forcing
from somewhere.
However, I realised I already had a custom IUserPreferredLanguages
Behrang Dadsetan wrote:
You mentioned the copyrights were transfered to ZF which is what I
recall reading a while ago.
But when I last checked
http://www.zope.org/DevHome/CVS/Contributor.pdf
I do wish the whole of DevHome would just die :-(
(I believe this is supposed to be happening right
Hey All,
Thought I'd share this and see if anyone had any better ideas...
So, I have a set of views that subclass each other, nothing out of the
ordinary there. However, I also want the zpts used by the views to
subclass each other, such that a subclassing view can use its parent's
macro(s)
60 matches
Mail list logo
