Luis Cortes wrote:
Is anybody bold enough to try Zope with ODBC to an ACCESS database?
Sure, nothing big's running here on top of Access, but Zope's definitely
connected to Access through ODBC; no problem. The only problem actually
is just Access' obscure error messages when developing.
Chris McDonough wrote:
Isn't this covered in the FAQ?
The FAQ wasn't referred to directly in the original announcement; there
was a web page with a FAQ but my mail message was already gone before
I read the FAQ.
Honestly I'm sort of surprised that there is such a strong reaction to
this.
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
I would like to echo what Dieter wrote here.
We need to encourage people who write products or other extensions to
Zope in writing cleanly, clearly defined extensions which can be used in
a black box manner.
Sure, but we also need to encourage people to study each
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
+[ Chris McDonough ]-
| This is pretty silly.
I agree, it got silly about 8 hours ago.
I don't think I've ever seen paranoia and religious fervour mixed in
quite the same way before. Anyone would think that
Oleg Broytmann wrote:
Where do you intend on going? If there was something better out there
you'd be humping its leg already.
Thanks goodness, I am not using Zope on production servers. I use Zope
only to experiments and understand the technology. Looked good until
yesterday.
This is
Martijn Pieters wrote:
[snip]
Now, please, can we stop this whole silly argument? Can't we talk about old
terminal types or something, instead?
That invocation only works on comp.lang.python. :)
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL
. :^)
And this is why I like and trust DC. You realize your heads get bopped. :)
As long as you do, even if you do continue to disagree with that weird
Martijn Faassen guy, I have no big worries. As long as the community
keeps learning (DC included), we're fine.
And-now-back-to-our-whining-about-Perl-ly yours
Michel Pelletier wrote:
[snip]
This is such a good point I wanted to share it with the Zope community
as well. The language issue is minor to the need for a definate object
model with clear interfaces. It shouldn't matter if the core of Zope is
written in Python or FORTH, from your
Paul Everitt wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
The addition of the Perl stuff will be bad if the Zope source will be
hacked up in various places in order to support this. I can be _good_ if
this means a focus on providing clean interfaces first, and a more
componentized architecture. I.e
[various folks basically suggest using UserDb and give useful tips]
Okay, thanks for the suggestions, folks -- UserDb it will be, then!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No
Hi there,
I'm about to describe a very nasty bug that appears to exist in
different guises in at least Zope 2.1.6 and Zope 2.2.2.
The bug is nasty because it occurs under rather restricted
circumstances, so nobody else noticed it yet, but it keeps biting _me_.
The circumstances:
* we have
Brad Clements wrote:
On 25 Sep 2000, at 21:01, Martijn Faassen wrote:
In Zope 2.2.2, the user cannot execute the external method E either.
Instead, the calling DTML code raises a NameError, basically saying our
external method does not exist.
I'll also dump this description
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
General problem description:
For a ZClass instance/external methods that is only viewable by
users with a particular role, the view operation fails if that role
is only added to a user in a place deeper in the folder tree than
Hi folks,
I hadn't seen the traffic on ZFormulator on this list before, and this looks
like a good bugfix; I knew there was a security related problem in
ZFormulator for a long time, and this may actually be the fix. I hadn't
been able to look at it for months, though I keep intending to get
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 1/18/06, Jürgen Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- how can i set the target language for the translation in the zpt?
That's tricky! :) You need either Localizer or the plone tool for that
now, I think. But it's mentioned in the documentation. By default it
just
Jürgen Herrmann wrote:
just tried this:
hacked in a MyLanguages in five's i18n.py:
class MyLanguages(object):
fake
implements(IUserPreferredLanguages)
def __init__(self, context):
self.context = context
def getPreferredLanguages(self):
return ('DE')
and in
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 1/26/06, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know the long term fate of Zope 2? (ie. is the plan to
eventually move everything into Zope 3, then slowly fade Zope 2 from the
picture, or will Zope 2 be with us forever?).
No, Zope 2 is definitely destined
Luciano Ramalho wrote:
I've been assigned to integrate an existing academic portal in Plone
with the OAI-PMH protocol as a data provider. Searching through this
list I found the message below, but no response.
Note that the oaipmh Python module in 2.0 form (pyoai) now has
facilities to build
Dennis Allison wrote:
Zope 2.8.4
Python 2.4.2
Startup error with Formulator. What's missing or broken?
The offending file is:
configure
xmlns=http://namespaces.zope.org/zope;
xmlns:i18n=http://namespaces.zope.org/i18n;
!-- i18n --
i18n:registerTranslations directory=i18n
Derek Basch wrote:
[snip]
I saw that the zope-perl project is virtually dead and was hoping that some
magical zope to perl
bridge existed. Something that would allow me to use our existing perl code as
an external method
or someting similar. Forgive me if my zope terminology is a bit off as I
Federico Schwindt wrote:
What do you mean by wsgi enabled? How does wsgi+ differ from wsgi?
The wsgi directive was enabled in 2.10.0b2. Re wsgi+, do you mean in
the graphic? I need to correct that as the text was truncated. It
should be wsgi+SpeedPack and wsgi+profile.
The speed drop in ZPT
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I tried to use Zope3 events to get informed when requests start and end.
One of our modules (the interface module to jpype) requires such
a notification for reliable work. Therefore, it tried to register
the corresponding subscriptions on import of this module.
Hello,
Concerning xslt transformations, you might want to consider an easier
API to use the XSLT infrastructure in libxml2/libxslt: lxml. See
http://codespeak.net/lxml
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
Hello,
It's a good question. :)
On Nov 7, 2007 7:51 AM, Chetan Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am to start working on a new web (site/application) project. Wanted
to find out better route from among the available choices. In other
words what are *you* using ?
It depends on what I'm doing.
Hey,
On Nov 27, 2007 2:18 AM, Rene B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm frustrated trying to select a python web framework. I've researched quite
a
few. CherryPy,Karrigell,Zope 2,3,Grok, Gluon,Django,Mod_Python. I've also
looked at templating languages like Spyce, and Cheetah.
I can see how that
Hi there,
On Nov 27, 2007 4:14 AM, Chetan Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Stick to Zope 2 with DTML if that serves your purpose. It will serve you well.
I think your problem is solved !!!
I don't think it so simple. He was looking for a vibrant community
that would support his needs. I
Hey,
On Nov 27, 2007 4:47 PM, Jaroslav Lukesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice words
I have near complette mirror of the old.zope.org from 2004 or 2005 if
someone wants (and rememner that old site and good where are many products
that you couldnot find at web now). There are many
Hey,
On Nov 27, 2007 5:14 PM, Gregory Dudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used Zope 2 too extensively to give it up. I use it for
several sites.
I don't see anything I like better, but have a nagging worry that
Zope, and especially Zope 2, may become increasingly neglected as
time goes by.
Hey,
On Nov 27, 2007 9:25 PM, Garry Saddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2007 17:19, Martijn Faassen wrote:
We need to identify some targets and see what resources we have to
accomplish them. Of course this shouldn't degenerate into a long
wishlist discussion
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 12:04 AM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So that's why I mention this quote : Martijn, I'm very curious
about the status, plan or purpose of the new zope.org?
Quick answer: I direct (cc) you to Martin Aspeli, and Jodok Batlogg on
this. Quick summary: work
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 12:16 AM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also consider putting them in some kind
of collective-like SVN repository so that people can
make changes when they need to.
I think this is a great idea as it works with the Plone collective this
way as
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 11:18 PM, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 12:16 AM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also consider putting them in some kind
of collective-like SVN repository so that people can
make changes when
Hey,
On Nov 29, 2007 12:53 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
For clarity, nobody but a ZC employee (at present) is supposed to be
checking in any code with any license other than the ZPL; in the
future, such a checkin will need to be approved
Hello,
Thanks very much for your feedback!
I'm cc-ing this discussion to grok-dev, as I want to make sure that
Grok developers see this. Future discussion
should continue on grok-dev, I think, as this is all pretty grok
specific by now.
On Nov 29, 2007 2:29 AM, Rene B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 29, 2007 8:43 PM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
the work of collecting interesting Zope 2 products, contacting the
authors (not strictly necessary but always a good thing to do) and
checking them in, possibly
cleaning things up here
/download/Silva/.
Links to developer mailing lists, the issue tracker, and info about CVS
access can be found on the Silva Product pages.
Contact
FMI contact Martijn Faassen, faassen at infrae com, +31 10 243 7051.
___
Zope-Announce maillist - Zope
Product Pages at
http://www.infrae.com/products/silva.
Download
The package can be downloaded from http://www.infrae.com/download/Silva/.
Links to developer mailing lists, the issue tracker, and info about CVS
access can be found on the Silva Product pages.
Contact
FMI contact Martijn Faassen
contact Martijn Faassen, faassen at infrae com, +31 10 243 7051.
___
Zope-Announce maillist - Zope-Announce@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
Zope-Announce for Announcements only - no discussions
(Related lists -
Users: http
Hi there,
The EuroPython talk submission deadline is quickly approaching - it's
friday may 18. So if you are thinking about giving a talk at
EuroPython, please submit one this week.
http://www.europython.org/
Besides talks, there will also be various Zope-related sprints taking
place the three
Hi there,
Tomorrow (friday may 18) is the EuroPython talk submission deadline!
So if you are thinking about giving a talk at EuroPython, please
submit it soon!
http://www.europython.org/
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Announce maillist -
Zope Foundation and DZUG boards meet
Potsdam, June 5, 2007 - the boards of the Zope Foundation and the DZUG
(German speaking Zope User Group) met in Potsdam, Germany. The meeting
took place after the close of the successful Zope-Tagung, a conference
on Zope that that DZUG organizes annually.
Hi there,
2007-10-10 - The Grok project is happy to release Grok 0.10.1! Grok
0.10.1 is a bugfix release of Grok, and the first outcome of the
Neanderthal Grok sprint that was hosted by GfU Cyrus in Cologne,
Germany, last week.
The sole aim of this release is to fix Grok's installation story.
Hi everybody,
The Grok team is happy to announce the release of Grok 0.11! Grok is
a web application framework built with Zope 3 technologies that aims
to be easy to use.
Grok 0.11 is a feature release of Grok, introducing important new features:
* Layers and skinning support. It is now easy
Hi there,
We are quickly approaching the Google of Summer of code again. The
Zope Foundation's application needs to be in soon.
In order to do a good application, we need to have a good selection of
mentors. So, if you're a Zope developer and you want to mentor a
student this summer, please add
The Grokkerdam Grok sprint
It was planned for a long time, but at last we are going to hold a
Grok sprint in the Netherlands. To be more precise, in Rotterdam.
Rotterdam will be Grokkerdam for the duration of the sprint!
Where: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
When: 30
Hi there,
If you want to submit a Zope-related proposal to the Google summer of
code, today and tomorrow are your last chance! The submission period
ends 0:00 UTC april 1, 2008, that's this monday 5:00 PM PDT over in
California, and 10 PM (22:00) CEST over here where I am in the
Netherlands.
So,
Hi there,
Because there was a lot of feedback from different projects that the
student application deadline was rather tight this year, Google has
extended the submission deadline for the Google Summer of Code has
been extended for a week until april 7. This gives us two chances:
* if you're a
Hi there,
I'm happy to announce that five student projects were accepted to the
Google Summer of Code this year. It looked dark for a while with only
2 projects assigned at first, but luckily that changed. Thank you,
Google!
You can find an overview of the accepted projects here:
Hi everybody,
The EuroPython talk submission deadline is fast approaching. Please
considering submitting a talk again at EuroPython last year. Europe
has a very active Zope community, and last year Zope seemed to have
more representation in web framework talks than the competition.
Contrast this
The Grok team is happy to announce the release of Grok 1.0a1. This is
the first step on the way to the release of Grok 1.0! With Grok 1.0 we
will deliver a stable, powerful, featureful framework for Python-based
web development. Grok 1.0a1 is a preview of the 1.0 release and a
continuation of the
+zope.security.interfaces.IUnauthorized
+
+Note that the name has to be 'index.html' for the exception
+view to work. (patch by Sidnei da Silva from Enfold,
+integration by Martijn Faassen (Startifact) for Infrae)
+
Bugs Fixed
- Collector #1306: Missing acquisition context on local
Hey,
The modification was made to the Zope 2 part of ZPT. It'd be nice if
this change could be made in the Zope 3 libraries? I guess this was
investigated but found impractical?
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
Brian Lloyd wrote:
I don't have a good answer for you, though I tend to agree with
you that some things just don't want to be accessed outside of
some larger context. I'd like to hear some different viewpoints
on how people think something like this should work...
What the difference
Brian Lloyd wrote:
Yes you could, except that you would also make them inaccessible
from DTML (or from anywhere else) for the same class of users.
Is it really acceptable that in order to use dtml-in objectIds
on a page that needs to be accessible to anonymous users that I
must grant
Paul Everitt wrote:
I can add a bit more background on the decision to have the API docs not
rendered from the source.
First, Zope used to have an online help system that inspected the source
and rendered documenation on the fly. Very nice indeed. But we yanked
it.
Why? The most
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
Thanks for getting this document going. It's good to see where XML is
going in Zope.
[note that the zope-xml list may be a better list to discuss these things;
I've cc-ed to there but we might want to move the thread there
completely]
I do have a question,
Thomas Weholt wrote:
Have anybody compared Zope to Roxen? Midgard? Or similar products? I saw
Roxen had document revision system, a thing I "reported missing" earlier in
this list.
While Zope may not have that, it does have versions and undo. More
version control facilities would indeed be
Hi there,
We've been experiencing some odd interactions between the ZCatalog and
acquisition. Inside the dtml-in catalog .. tags things seem to go
screwy. It's picking up the properties in the root folder instead of
in the subfolder (the context), where the dtml-in catalog .. is used. Why
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Martijn Faassen writes:
[snip acquisition 'problem' with the catalog]
I can understand that the result is not what one wants, but
when I understand aquisition correct, it is in accordance
with the documentation.
Yes, after some more pondering and some experimentation
Hi there,
I see that the 2.2 still has this annoying, and seemingly completely
unnecessary minor change in the tab order:
Tabs for folder in 2.1:
Contents View Properties Import/Export Security Undo Find
Tabs for folder in 2.2:
Contents Import/Export Properties View Find Security Undo
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:27:33 -0400 (EDT), Ken Manheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Not sure that will scale, but creating new lists for each proposal
definitely won't scale.
I dont see this as a problem: You only create a new list when the
traffic for that proposal
Chris Withers wrote:
[snip]
Sometimes, it'll just sit there redirecting back to the css page infinitely..
yum :-S
Yeah, I've seen that kind of weirdness show up too occasionally; some kind
of infinite css getting loop in Netscape. A couple of times I've seen it
blow up the server logs; I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just updated to 2.3.0 release using CVS. My CSS serving has
subsequently broken. The CSS serving worked fine with the CVS code from
2.3.0b2. I didn't get to check b3 - we had a public holiday on Friday and
that meant that the one working day assigned to the b3
Hi there,
Type marshalling is seriously broken in ZSQL methods. The bug is a bit
subtle, though. There are reports of this in the collector almost a month
old, and the severity of this bug is pretty high (could seriously disrupt Zope
upgrades to recent versions which apparently have this bug; I
[browsing through old versions of Zope]
I can't find any code that's supposed to do this in old versions of
Zope either. (I may be missing something, though)
If this feature was never there, I'd consider the ZSQL documentation
(for instance in the Zope help) to be quite broken however.
Rene Pijlman wrote:
On 10 Jul 2001 08:06:42 +0200, you wrote:
| How about treating some of the most critically needed Zope modules
| as a community project?
I agree totally.
So what do you think are the most needed Zope products?
Form tools! :)
Uhmm. Check. Feel free to join the
Hi there,
There appears to be a bug in Zope 2.4.1's OFS/Traversable.py. I've tried
to identify the same bug in the CVS, but oddly enough I couldn't find it.
There doesn't appear to be any Zope 2.4.1 CVS branch and the Zope 2.4
branch didn't have any changes to this file in 3 months, but doesn't
Paul Everitt wrote:
At last, the announcement I've been dying to make. After much
deliberation -- meaning, I've procrastinated for too long :^) -- I'm
pleased to announce our approach for opening the CVS repository to
community checkins.
Cool, at last!
Jay, Dylan wrote:
[snip]
Also in my searches I came across lots of references to something called
ZTables. This seems to be a Catalog with a UI that is about lots of tabular
information (rather than a ZCatalog which is specialized to replicating and
indexing existing objects). Is this dead?
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Andy McKay wrote:
Is out and:
Large file support is now enabled on Win32 and Win64 platforms, and
automatically configured (at least on Linux and Solaris).
Cool, that will mean there will be less worries about Zope users hitting the
2 gig limit.
But
Andy wrote:
You seem to be aware of the fact, but I'd like to point it out
explicitely: from a security point of view, this is completely useless.
As HTML stripping is often done for security reasons, I fail to see the
interest in such a feature.
That depends where you do the checking,
Brad Clements wrote:
I'm still casting around for a suggestion on where I can go to fix this.
I have a ParsedXML object in the methods list of a ZClass Product.
The Access Contents Information Permission Mapping always get's reset to blank
in
the ParsedXML object when Zope restarts.
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
P.S. Speaking of naming, I still dislike feature as a term for interface
implementations; various suggestions available on the Feature page of the
ComponentArchitecture Wiki. :)
I agree. I still much prefer 'adaptor' and I don't buy the
'adaptors sound too much like
Chris McDonough wrote:
The other thing is that
the core coders at Zope Corp snip are the only ones that can get
around the
fishbowl if they so desire.
Here! Here!
Not really. I couldn't, at least.
You guys can use the fishbowl as what is in effect an announcement
service. I'm
Chris McDonough wrote:
There really is a lot more work that goes into the stuff in the
fishbowl from the folks at ZC than just an announcement
Exactly. But in the end, if nobody responds except internally at ZC,
and you implement it, the fishbowl stuff is kind of an announcement,
right? And
Chris Withers wrote:
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
I personally would like to see ZPT support plain text at some point, and it
already has some of the things necessary to do it. But that's a separate
issue from Zope 3X or Zope 3 itself.
It already can:
dummy tal:omit-tag=
Andreas Jung wrote:
[snip]
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 11:38, Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
If people agree, I will go through the Zope 3 CVS and change all
references
from Feature to Adaptor. :)
Please try to avoid crossposts over zope-dev and zope3-dev.
Apologies
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
a mailing list, are needed at least to get contributors going. I had
to ask about releasing ParsedXML several times until I got some kind of
'aye' out of anyone. And it still wasn't clear. I shouldn't have to
be that persistent.
Well
Ulrich Eck wrote:
Hi out there :)
How would you do repeating texts or conditional texts like this? I mean,
perhaps it's obvious; I haven't played enough with ZPT yet.
Just for your info:
there is one product that tries to address this problem: TERRY
Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
[snip]
Actually, I was kind of hoping Martijn Faassen would pipe up and say I
applied the restricted python patches you've already put up on the
Zope-2_4-branch, and my problems with ParsedXML went away! since he's
one of the folks that did NOT benefit from
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 13:44, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
Soo... if shutting off GC extends time between crashes for some folks
from every 15 minutes to 3 times a day, my advise is to shut off GC.
Now I can really confirm that gc.disable() is enough to avoid
Hi there,
I have some issues with using declareProtected() outside product
classes (deriving from ObjectManager or SimpleItem). An external method
example that _does_ work, taken from the ZDG:
import Globals
import Acquisition
from AccessControl import ClassSecurityInfo
class
Dieter Maurer wrote:
[snip]
Now replace the line security.declarePublic('getTitle') with something like
security.declareProtected('View', 'getTitle'), and suddenly nobody is
allowed to call getTitle() on a Book object anymore.
You must acquistion wrap your book objects. Otherwise,
Chris Withers wrote:
seb bacon wrote:
It wouldn't surprise me - ZPT has the roughly the same overheads as DTML
for the language parsing, but a presentation template goes through an
HTML parser in addition - which is always going to be quite slow in
python.
IIRC, The HTML Parser is
Hey,
I'm running into a weird problem I'm not sure how to tackle. I've
noticed that under some circumstances it takes a long time to copy
and paste a ParsedXML object. This seems to happen in a clean Zope,
at least in the Zope root, though it doesn't seem to happen in folders.
I've also had it
Hi again,
Another data point. Copy paste of ParsedXML documents is normal
and fast when the object is in a folder not surrounded by too
many other folders (or objects in general, not sure yet). If I create
a bunch of very large folders sitting next to the ParsedXML document
that I'm going to
Gary Poster wrote:
So, um, Stephan, any ideas? :-) I know you are busy, but are you
interested in getting this in 2.6? I could help with testing as before, but
I'd prefer to have you signed on as the primary resource.
I don't know OrderedFolder very well but it'd be very useful in several
Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are trying to get to the bottom of a few straggling
instability reports, so we're planning to go ahead with
I started with 2.5.1b1 today and have problems with our one central
index_html approach.
That would be really
Hey,
Belated response, but..
Jim Fulton wrote:
Speaking of Zope 2.8, Jeremy Hylton has suggested that, perhaps, Zope 2.8
should be a release that provides *only*:
- New-style ExtensionClass, and
- ZODB 3.3, featuring multi-version concurrency control,
plus any features that have been
Jim Fulton wrote:
See:
Packages3/Interface in CVS
If you put this ahead of the Zope 2 Interface package in
your Python path, then you can use Zope 3 interfaces with Zope 2.
That's great news!
Is it the intention that this will be the default Interface package
in Zope 2.8 then, or is
Jim Fulton wrote:
Steve Alexander and I will be hosting a sprint in Fredericksburg
January 12-14, 2004:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/SteveVisitingFredericksburgSprint
A possible topic is Zope 2 to Zope 3 transition and working on
Zope 2.9.
Before independent discussions erupt here, see
Hi there,
Some changes in Zope 2.7 break the possibility to make management_page_charset
a callable (for instance a method).
This breaks Formulator, as it uses this facility. This works just fine
in Zope 2.6, but breaks in Zope 2.7.
The silly thing is that Formulator 2.6.0 breaks in Zope 2.7
Brian Lloyd wrote:
I forward-ported these to the 2.7 branch the head. Any testing
you can do to make sure I didn't break anything would be appreciated.
I'm having trouble understanding what you forward-ported and what you'd
like me to test. As far as I can determine
Brian Lloyd wrote:
I forward-ported these to the 2.7 branch the head. Any testing
you can do to make sure I didn't break anything would be appreciated.
Now I understand that you were responding to these messages:
I think the problem is same as reported by Kazuya Fukamachi
Hajime Nakagami wrote:
Hi
Sorry I have not execute Zope 2.7 or HEAD now.
But I think needs not only the patch,
http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/OFS/dtml/properties.dtml.diff?r1=1.14r2=1.15
but also below
[patch to properties.dtml]
To repeat: patching properties.dtml will never be able
Brian Lloyd wrote:
I was trying to be responsive to getting the issue resolved, since
I'd like to make a (hopefully final) beta of 2.7 of Friday. I'll be
happy to check in (or have you check in) whatever fixes are needed
to give you the flexibility you need so long as it is b/w compatible,
Santi Camps wrote:
My problem is that the adapter object, and also the adapted object
contained in it, are out of publisher context or something like this.
For instance, absolute_url() methods doesn't work becouse REQUEST is not
defined.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean; I don't
Santi Camps wrote:
Very interesting. That's what I was looking for. I will try to extract
this mechanism from CMF.
Silva has co-evolved (some of it inspired directly by CMF, some by Zope 3)
much of the same infrastructure. Our view system is quite different,
and some large changes to it in
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Acquisition is very powerful, and very magic at the same time.
Adapters is Zope3 way of implementing Acquisition in a less
surprising way.
The main drawback of acquisition, which is a drawback in general of
Zope 2, is that namespaces get conflated.
Zope 2 is
Santi Camps wrote:
Thats very interesting !! I was rewriting __getattr__ to allow the
adapter access adapted object attributes, but doing this way its clear
and easier. Inheriting from Acquisition Implicit and applying the
adapter using __of__ I obtain the same result and have less problems.
1 - 100 of 1200 matches
Mail list logo