1 12:59 PM
:To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Subject: Re: [Zope] Caching/http-acceleration and proxying Zope-served
:content
:
:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I have a question, for anyone experienced in working with Zope and caching
: proxies:
:
: I'm setting up a load-balanced server farm that has nodes tha
wonder just how good Apache's
mod_proxy caching is? Any thoughts?
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Shane Hathaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope] Caching/http-acceleration and proxying Zope-served
content
[EMAIL
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:31:35 +0100 (CET), Peter Sabaini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i use a combination of squid / apache because i need some
re-writing, you could as well use squid for caching and apache for
(name-based) virtual hosting. this of course introduces additional
latency, but
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Toby Dickenson wrote:
:On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:31:35 +0100 (CET), Peter Sabaini
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
:actually i use a combination of squid / apache because i need some
:re-writing, you could as well use squid for caching and apache for
:(name-based) virtual hosting.
I have a question, for anyone experienced in working with Zope and caching
proxies:
I'm setting up a load-balanced server farm that has nodes that will run
Apache and proxy (via mod_proxy) to ZEO clients running ZServer. This farm
is routed (both ways) through a layer 4 load-balancing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question, for anyone experienced in working with Zope and caching
proxies:
I'm setting up a load-balanced server farm that has nodes that will run
Apache and proxy (via mod_proxy) to ZEO clients running ZServer. This farm
is routed (both ways) through a
