Re: [Zope] Medusa vs. Apache

2000-05-26 Thread Bill Anderson
"Coleman, Bryan" wrote: > > If performance is a concern I would go with Apache. It is much more robust > and faster than Medusa. I have load tested them both and Apache leaves > Medusa far behind. Would you mind posting the details? ___ Zope maillist

RE: [Zope] Medusa vs. Apache

2000-05-26 Thread Coleman, Bryan
Petru Paler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 11:13 AM > To: Jilani Khaldi > Cc: Zope ML > Subject: Re: [Zope] Medusa vs. Apache > > > Hi All, > > I wonder if it is more convenient to stay with Apache or to move to > > Medusa for a

Re: [Zope] Medusa vs. Apache

2000-05-24 Thread Petru Paler
> Hi All, > I wonder if it is more convenient to stay with Apache or to move to > Medusa for a best use of Zope? If you don't need any of the Apache features go with ZServer/Medusa. -Petru ___ Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.

[Zope] Medusa vs. Apache

2000-05-24 Thread Jilani Khaldi
Hi All, I wonder if it is more convenient to stay with Apache or to move to Medusa for a best use of Zope? Thanks. Jilani -- ___ http://space.tin.it/scuola/jkhaldi FreeBSD ~ The Power To Serve ___ Zo

[Zope] Medusa vs. Apache

2000-05-24 Thread Jilani Khaldi
Hi All, I wonder if it is more convenient to stay with Apache or to move to Medusa a best use of Zope? Thanks. Jilani -- ___ http://space.tin.it/scuola/jkhaldi FreeBSD ~ The Power To Serve ___ Zope m