Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Paul Everitt wrote:
> > You're absolutely right on this. Amos' post recently described the
> > various things in various stages of release that should give some hope
> > for the situation. These things really are an improvement. I'm
> > crossing my fingers that this tu
Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> Adam wrote:
> > What makes me most uncomfortable about this is the opportunity
> > cost. Every hour of development time integrating Perl is one
> > less hour
>
> As I tried to mention in my "Redux" post a few moments ago, this isn't
> the case. ActiveState is doing the
Paul Everitt wrote:
> You're absolutely right on this. Amos' post recently described the
> various things in various stages of release that should give some hope
> for the situation. These things really are an improvement. I'm
> crossing my fingers that this turns into a torrent of material tha
Adam wrote:
> What makes me most uncomfortable about this is the opportunity
> cost. Every hour of development time integrating Perl is one
> less hour
As I tried to mention in my "Redux" post a few moments ago, this isn't
the case. ActiveState is doing the engineering.
> working on other pa
[Adam Clark, on Thu, 25 May 2000]
:: Hope nobody minds a newbie perspective on this.
::
:: I spent the last 4 years programming (and unabashedly loving) Perl, and I
:: don't think adding Perl to Zope will attract a lot more people. The large
:: scope of Zope and the similarities between Python
Hope nobody minds a newbie perspective on this.
I spent the last 4 years programming (and unabashedly loving) Perl, and I
don't think adding Perl to Zope will attract a lot more people. The large
scope of Zope and the similarities between Python and Perl mean that I've spent
a whole lot more ti
