Re: [Zope] Re: Give it a rest + answers. (Re: Re: Zope + Apache on Quad Debian machine)

2006-03-23 Thread Chris Withers
Andrew Sawyers wrote: The other engineer was me, and it was close enough to double the load per instance, per cpu. tangential question: I'm assuming you were using LVS in front of these boxes? If so, how'd you get the both clients on the box accessible by LVS? 2 ip addresses? cheers,

Re: [Zope] Re: Give it a rest + answers. (Re: Re: Zope + Apache on Quad Debian machine)

2006-03-23 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: Andrew Sawyers wrote: The other engineer was me, and it was close enough to double the load per instance, per cpu. tangential question: I'm assuming you were using LVS in front of these boxes? If so, how'd you get the

[Zope] Re: Give it a rest + answers. (Re: Re: Zope + Apache on Quad Debian machine)

2006-03-22 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote: snip Let me be the first to admit my total lack of knowledge of kernel task schedulers, but generally speaking, unless the scheduler makes sure that a threaded python process never ever gets distributed over two

Re: [Zope] Re: Give it a rest + answers. (Re: Re: Zope + Apache on Quad Debian machine)

2006-03-22 Thread Andrew Sawyers
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 08:24 -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 WHile at ZC, one of the other engineers and I did some testing on SMB boxes, and found that one appserver per CPU gave us near linear scaling of the application, without any explicit