Hi,
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> > > I've got to say I agree with you here. I'm still not 100% sure why the
> > > superuser or bootstrap user can't own anything.
> >
> > It's due to a combination of the trojan horse issue and the sticky
> > authentica
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Evan Simpson wrote:
> > I've got to say I agree with you here. I'm still not 100% sure why the
> > superuser or bootstrap user can't own anything.
>
> It's due to a combination of the trojan horse issue and the sticky
> authentication issue, I think. You really don't want t
From: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
> > Well, okay, let me rephrase the question:
> > Why is it bad for the bootstrap user to own anything?
> > It used to be considered okay before Zope 2.2, so was has been
> > changed/discovered that makes this n
On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
> > Well, I think the real problem is that the account that you use to
> > "bootstrap" Zope is named "superuser". If it was named something else
> > like "bootstrapuser" or "fixupuser" or something, I doubt you'd wonder why
> > it couldn't own anything.
>
