Re: [Zope] A new development model for Zope?

2000-05-26 Thread Bill Anderson

Paolo Bizzarri wrote:
 
 Hi everybody,
 
 I was just wondering if Zope could not get a better development model.
  I will explain briefly.
 
 Currently, Zope seems to have a model for major releases, in which bugs
 are corrected and features (possibly large features) are added in each
 new release. This model, IMHO, performs poorly on the stability and bug
 fixing side.
 
 My proposal is that Zope should go through a stable/development version,
 in a similar way to the linux-kernel. New heavy features should be only
 for the development Zope, whereas the stable Zope should receive only
 the bugfixes and the (micro) new features. This should be of major
 importance, because I would like to have Zope to increase stability on
 normal versions, without any further feature that I do not need.
 
 What do you think about it ?


I think we see this proposal about every three months on average. ;-)

Personally, I would like to see a patch collector, for 'unofficial
patches'. Kind of like the ac patches for linux (and now the aa and who
knows who else is doing it now).

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )




Re: [Zope] A new development model for Zope?

2000-05-26 Thread Paolo Bizzarri

Hi Zopers,

  My proposal is that Zope should go through a stable/development version,
  in a similar way to the linux-kernel. New heavy features should be only
  for the development Zope, whereas the stable Zope should receive only
  the bugfixes and the (micro) new features. This should be of major
  importance, because I would like to have Zope to increase stability on
  normal versions, without any further feature that I do not need.
 
  What do you think about it ?

 I think we see this proposal about every three months on average. ;-)


Well, perhaps I got my eyes too much closed... :=(

 Personally, I would like to see a patch collector, for 'unofficial
 patches'. Kind of like the ac patches for linux (and now the aa and who
 knows who else is doing it now).

Exactly. For example, here two simple patches that should be collected and
posted toward 2.1.6:

- patch for renaming single objects (something I have seen in the new
2.2.0a version);

- patch for the REQUEST object problem

What do you think about it ?

Ciao

Paolo

--
Paolo Bizzarri - Responsabile Marketing  I3 Icube Srl
Sede:   Via Ridolfi 15 - 56124 Pisa (PI), Italia
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.icube.it
Tel:(+39) 050 97 02 07  Fax: (+39) 050 31 36 588




___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )




Re: [Zope] A new development model for Zope?

2000-05-26 Thread Bill Anderson

Paolo Bizzarri wrote:
 
 Hi Zopers,
 
   My proposal is that Zope should go through a stable/development version,
   in a similar way to the linux-kernel. New heavy features should be only
   for the development Zope, whereas the stable Zope should receive only
   the bugfixes and the (micro) new features. This should be of major
   importance, because I would like to have Zope to increase stability on
   normal versions, without any further feature that I do not need.
  
   What do you think about it ?
 
  I think we see this proposal about every three months on average. ;-)
 
 
 Well, perhaps I got my eyes too much closed... :=(

Fear not, I happen to like the proposal myself.


  Personally, I would like to see a patch collector, for 'unofficial
  patches'. Kind of like the ac patches for linux (and now the aa and who
  knows who else is doing it now).
 
 Exactly. For example, here two simple patches that should be collected and
 posted toward 2.1.6:
 
 - patch for renaming single objects (something I have seen in the new
 2.2.0a version);
 
 - patch for the REQUEST object problem
 
 What do you think about it ?

 Well, unless anyone has any serious objections (or DC can pull it off
soon), I can implement a site for this.

 On that note, I am now accepting suggestions and requests on it. ;-)

Bill Anderson

___
Zope maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )